Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28191036›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological engineering2017

Influence of gold nanoparticle surface chemistry and diameter upon Alzheimer's disease amyloid-β protein aggregation.

Kelly A Moore, Kayla M Pate, Deborah D Soto-Ortega, Samuel Lohse, Nicholas van der Munnik, Mihyun Lim, Kaliah S Jackson, Venetia D Lyles, Lemeisha Jones, Nisha Glassgow and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Emerging Theranostic Nanomaterials in Diabetes and Its Complications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  16. Dependence of the Nanoscale Composite Morphology of FeMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kelly A MooreBiomedical Engineering Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
Kayla M PateDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of South Carolina, 2C02 Swearingen Engineering Center, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
Deborah D Soto-OrtegaBiomedical Engineering Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
Samuel LohseDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.
Nicholas van der MunnikDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of South Carolina, 2C02 Swearingen Engineering Center, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
Mihyun LimDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
Kaliah S JacksonDepartment of Biological and Physical Sciences, South Carolina State University, Orangeburg, SC 29117 USA.
Venetia D LylesDepartment of Biological and Physical Sciences, South Carolina State University, Orangeburg, SC 29117 USA.
Lemeisha JonesDepartment of Biological and Physical Sciences, South Carolina State University, Orangeburg, SC 29117 USA.
Nisha GlassgowDepartment of Biological and Physical Sciences, South Carolina State University, Orangeburg, SC 29117 USA.
Vanessa M NapumechenoDepartment of Biological and Physical Sciences, South Carolina State University, Orangeburg, SC 29117 USA.
Shanee MobleyDepartment of Biological and Physical Sciences, South Carolina State University, Orangeburg, SC 29117 USA.
Mark J UlineBiomedical Engineering Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.
Rahina MahtabDepartment of Biological and Physical Sciences, South Carolina State University, Orangeburg, SC 29117 USA.
Catherine J MurphyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801 USA.
Melissa A MossBiomedical Engineering Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeposits of aggregated amyloid-β protein (Aβ) are a pathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Thus, one therapeutic strategy is to eliminate these deposits by halting Aβ aggregation. While a variety of possible aggregation inhibitors have been explored, only nanoparticles (NPs) exhibit promise at low substoichiometric ratios. With tunable size, shape, and surface properties, NPs present an ideal platform for rationally designed Aβ aggregation inhibitors. In this study, we characterized the inhibitory capabilities of gold nanospheres exhibiting different surface coatings and diameters.

resultsBoth NP diameter and surface chemistry were found to modulate the extent of aggregation, while NP electric charge influenced aggregate morphology. Notably, 8 nm and 18 nm poly(acrylic acid)-coated NPs abrogated Aβ aggregation at a substoichiometric ratio of 1:2,000,000. Theoretical calculations suggest that this low stoichiometry could arise from altered solution conditions near the NP surface. Specifically, local solution pH and charge density are congruent with conditions that influence aggregation.

conclusionsThese findings demonstrate the potential of surface-coated gold nanospheres to serve as tunable therapeutic agents for the inhibition of Aβ aggregation. Insights gained into the physiochemical properties of effective NP inhibitors will inform future rational design of effective NP-based therapeutics for AD.

Indexed as

Aggregate morphologyAlzheimer’s diseaseAmyloid-β proteinGold nanoparticlesInhibitionProtein aggregation

Identifiers

PMID28191036
PMCPMC5292815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.