Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28191015›Full record

ArticleAdvances in bioinformatics2017

Combined Docking with Classical Force Field and Quantum Chemical Semiempirical Method PM7.

A V Sulimov, D C Kutov, E V Katkova, V B Sulimov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. ACS omega · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A V SulimovDimonta Ltd., Nagornaya Str. 15, Building 8, Moscow 117186, Russia; Research Computer Center (NIVC), M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University (MGU), Leninskiye Gory 1, Building 4, Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8767-642X
D C KutovDimonta Ltd., Nagornaya Str. 15, Building 8, Moscow 117186, Russia; Research Computer Center (NIVC), M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University (MGU), Leninskiye Gory 1, Building 4, Moscow 119991, Russia.
E V KatkovaDimonta Ltd., Nagornaya Str. 15, Building 8, Moscow 117186, Russia; Research Computer Center (NIVC), M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University (MGU), Leninskiye Gory 1, Building 4, Moscow 119991, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9961-4069
V B SulimovDimonta Ltd., Nagornaya Str. 15, Building 8, Moscow 117186, Russia; Research Computer Center (NIVC), M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University (MGU), Leninskiye Gory 1, Building 4, Moscow 119991, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Results of the combined use of the classical force field and the recent quantum chemical PM7 method for docking are presented. Initially the gridless docking of a flexible low molecular weight ligand into the rigid target protein is performed with the energy function calculated in the MMFF94 force field with implicit water solvent in the PCM model. Among several hundred thousand local minima, which are found in the docking procedure, about eight thousand lowest energy minima are chosen and then energies of these minima are recalculated with the recent quantum chemical semiempirical PM7 method. This procedure is applied to 16 test complexes with different proteins and ligands. For almost all test complexes such energy recalculation results in the global energy minimum configuration corresponding to the ligand pose near the native ligand position in the crystalized protein-ligand complex. A significant improvement of the ligand positioning accuracy comparing with MMFF94 energy calculations is demonstrated.

Identifiers

PMID28191015
PMCPMC5278191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.