Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28190876›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2017

The evolution of tumour phylogenetics: principles and practice.

Russell Schwartz, Alejandro A Schäffer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 152 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
152citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

152 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Inferring and summarizing tumor phylogenies from bulk DNA data.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Deconvolving Phylogenetic Distance Mixtures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sc-TUSV-Ext: Single-Cell Clonal Lineage Inference from Single Nucleotide Variants, Copy Number Alterations, and Structural Variants.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Analysis of Shared Variants between Cancer Biospecimens.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article

92 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Russell SchwartzDepartment of Biological Sciences and Computational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15217, USA.
Alejandro A SchäfferComputational Biology Branch, National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.

Funding

Case Studies In GeneticsZIALM000097 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI SCHAFFER, ALEJANDRO A · 2009 to 2019
$4.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 LM999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA LM000097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid advances in high-throughput sequencing and a growing realization of the importance of evolutionary theory to cancer genomics have led to a proliferation of phylogenetic studies of tumour progression. These studies have yielded not only new insights but also a plethora of experimental approaches, sometimes reaching conflicting or poorly supported conclusions. Here, we consider this body of work in light of the key computational principles underpinning phylogenetic inference, with the goal of providing practical guidance on the design and analysis of scientifically rigorous tumour phylogeny studies. We survey the range of methods and tools available to the researcher, their key applications, and the various unsolved problems, closing with a perspective on the prospects and broader implications of this field.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPhylogenyAlgorithmsAnimalsGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID28190876
PMCPMC5886015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.