ArticlePatient education and counseling2017
Predictors of adherence to follow-up recommendations after an abnormal Pap smear among underserved inner-city women.
Article in Patient education and counseling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Demographic and Psychosocial Characteristics Associated With Use of a Prostate Cancer Survivorship Website: Implications From a Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Trial
- Article
- Untimely follow-up after cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study among healthcare providers in Flanders (Belgium).PloS one · 2026Article
- Predicting Pre- and Post-Diagnostic Depression in Women with Abnormal Pap Screening Tests: A Neural Network Approach.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Proposed mHealth Intervention to Address Patient Barriers to Colposcopy Attendance: Qualitative Interview Study of Clinic Staff and Patient Perspectives.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Experiences of health information-seeking among patients with cancer in China: a qualitative study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of follow-up colposcopy procedures after abnormal cervical screening result across a statewide study in Mississippi.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- An Artificial Neural Network Prediction Model of Depressive Symptoms among Women with Abnormal Papanicolaou Smear Results before and after Diagnostic Procedures.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Association between p16/Ki-67 dual stain cytology results prior to and 6 months after LLETZ treatment for CIN and the follow-up regimen three years after treatment: a retrospective cohort study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- 'Only to reconcile with it'. The coping experience amongst middle-aged and older cancer survivors: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Follow-up Colposcopy Procedures After Abnormal Cervical Screening Result Across a Statewide Study in Mississippi.Research square · 2024Article
- Detecting the impact of diagnostic procedures in Pap-positive women on anxiety using artificial neural networks.PloS one · 2024Article
- New Paradigms in the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Article
- Factors associated with receiving results and attending colposcopy in patients with positive HPV screens in Mexico City.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Confusion and anxiety in between abnormal cervical cancer screening results and colposcopy: "The land of the unknown".Patient education and counseling · 2023Article
- Reallocating Cervical Cancer Preventive Service Spending from Low- to High-Value Clinical Scenarios.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2023Article
- Effects of pre-operative education tailored to information-seeking styles on pre-operative anxiety and depression among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled trial.International journal of nursing sciences · 2023Article
- Factors associated with timely colposcopy following an abnormal cervical cancer test result.Preventive medicine · 2022Article
- Increased disparities associated with black women and abnormal cervical cancer screening follow-up.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2022Article
- Colposcopy non-attendance following an abnormal cervical cancer screening result: a prospective population-based cohort study.BMC women's health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to identify cognitive-affective predictors of adherence to initial diagnostic colposcopy and 6-month follow-up recommendations among underserved women.
methodsA secondary data analysis was completed of a randomized clinical trial assessing tailored telephone counseling for colposcopy adherence after an abnormal screening Pap smear among 210 underserved inner-city women.
resultsAdherence to initial diagnostic colposcopy was significantly associated with greater self-efficacy (OR=1.504, 95% CI 1.021-2.216). Women with lower monitoring attentional style had significantly greater adherence to 6-month follow-up recommendations compared to women with higher monitoring scores (OR=0.785, 95% CI 0.659-0.935).
conclusionIncreasing cervical cancer-related self-efficacy and tailoring cervical cancer risk communication to monitoring attentional style may help improve adherence to follow-up recommendations after an abnormal Pap smear test result. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Future research is needed to develop and implement psychosocial approaches to improving adherence to diagnostic colposcopy and follow-up recommendations adherence among underserved women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.