Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28190042›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2017

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Protocols for Problematic Plant, Oomycete, and Fungal Samples.

M Angélica Bello, Yolanda Ruiz-León, J Vladimir Sandoval-Sierra, Svetlana Rezinciuc, Javier Diéguez-Uribeondo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Culture Conditions Shape the Phenotype and Quality ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Application and Mechanism of Action of Carvacrol AgainstJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. InvestigatingAccess microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Physiological characterization of the wild almondFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M Angélica BelloBiodiversity and Conservation Department, Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC; mabello2@rjb.csic.es.
Yolanda Ruiz-LeónResearch Support Unit, Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC.
J Vladimir Sandoval-SierraMycology Department, Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC.
Svetlana RezinciucDivision of Glycoscience, AlbaNova University Center, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).
Javier Diéguez-UribeondoMycology Department, Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC; dieguez@rjb.csic.es.
Real Jardín Botánico · ESKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Common problems in the processing of biological samples for observations with the scanning electron microscope (SEM) include cell collapse, treatment of samples from wet microenvironments and cell destruction. Using young floral tissues, oomycete cysts, and fungi spores (Agaricales) as examples, specific protocols to process delicate samples are described here that overcome some of the main challenges in sample treatment for image capture under the SEM. Floral meristems fixed with FAA (Formalin-Acetic-Alcohol) and processed with the Critical Point Dryer (CPD) did not display collapsed cellular walls or distorted organs. These results are crucial for the reconstruction of floral development. A similar CPD-based treatment of samples from wet microenvironments, such as the glutaraldehyde-fixed oomycete cysts, is optimal to test the differential growth of diagnostic characteristics (e.g., the cyst spines) on different types of substrates. Destruction of nurse cells attached to fungi spores was avoided after rehydration, dehydration, and the CPD treatment, an important step for further functional studies of these cells. The protocols detailed here represent low-cost and rapid alternatives for the acquisition of good-quality images to reconstruct growth processes and to study diagnostic characteristics.

Indexed as

Cell WallFungiMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningOomycetesPlantsSpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID28190042
PMCPMC5408598
OpenAlexW2583718819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.