Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28189773›Full record

ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2017

Mathematical imaging methods for mitosis analysis in live-cell phase contrast microscopy.

Joana Sarah Grah, Jennifer Alison Harrington, Siang Boon Koh, Jeremy Andrew Pike, Alexander Schreiner, Martin Burger, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Stefanie Reichelt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Tui: A Multigenerational and Expert-Correctable Tracker for Cellular Dynamics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Digital Holographic Microscopy to Assess Cell Behavior.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joana Sarah GrahUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jg704@cam.ac.uk.
Jennifer Alison HarringtonUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom.
Siang Boon KohUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom.
Jeremy Andrew PikeUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom.
Alexander SchreinerUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom.
Martin BurgerWestfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Institute for Computational and Applied Mathematics, Einsteinstrasse 62, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Carola-Bibiane SchönliebUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, United Kingdom.
Stefanie ReicheltUniversity of Cambridge, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15678European Research Council 615216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper we propose a workflow to detect and track mitotic cells in time-lapse microscopy image sequences. In order to avoid the requirement for cell lines expressing fluorescent markers and the associated phototoxicity, phase contrast microscopy is often preferred over fluorescence microscopy in live-cell imaging. However, common specific image characteristics complicate image processing and impede use of standard methods. Nevertheless, automated analysis is desirable due to manual analysis being subjective, biased and extremely time-consuming for large data sets. Here, we present the following workflow based on mathematical imaging methods. In the first step, mitosis detection is performed by means of the circular Hough transform. The obtained circular contour subsequently serves as an initialisation for the tracking algorithm based on variational methods. It is sub-divided into two parts: in order to determine the beginning of the whole mitosis cycle, a backwards tracking procedure is performed. After that, the cell is tracked forwards in time until the end of mitosis. As a result, the average of mitosis duration and ratios of different cell fates (cell death, no division, division into two or more daughter cells) can be measured and statistics on cell morphologies can be obtained. All of the tools are featured in the user-friendly MATLAB®Graphical User Interface MitosisAnalyser.

Indexed as

MitosisAlgorithmsCell Line, TumorCell TrackingEpithelial CellsHeLa CellsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInsulin-Secreting CellsMicroscopy, FluorescenceMicroscopy, Phase-ContrastTime-Lapse ImagingWorkflowCell trackingCircular Hough transformLevel-set methodsMitosis analysisPhase contrast microscopyVariational methods

Identifiers

PMID28189773
PMCPMC6414815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.