Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2818973›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of industrial medicine1989

Outcome of pregnancy in relation to irregular and inconvenient work schedules.

G Axelsson, R Rylander, I Molin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of industrial medicine, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Menstrual Cycle and Sleep.Sleep medicine clinics · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Pregnancy, childbirth, and puerperium outcomes in female firefighters in Korea.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Reproductive Health Concerns Among Female Firefighters.International fire service journal of leadership and management · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

G AxelssonDepartment of Environmental Hygiene, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
R Rylander
I Molin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relation between irregular and inconvenient working hours and the outcome of pregnancy was studied among women employed at a hospital in Sweden some time between 1980 and 1984. A questionnaire was distributed to 807 women; 81% replied. The pregnancies were divided into six groups with respect to work schedules during pregnancy. A slightly, but not significantly, increased risk of miscarriage was found in women who worked irregular hours or rotating shifts compared with women who worked only during the day (RR = 1.44, 95% confidence interval 0.83-2.51). Infants of non-smoking mothers who worked irregular hours had significantly lower birth weights than infants of non-smoking women working day time only. This difference was largest at birth order 2+. Similar results were found for infants of this birth order whose non-smoking mothers worked evenings or rotating shift.

Indexed as

WomenWomen, WorkingWorkWork Schedule ToleranceAbortion, SpontaneousCoffeeFemaleHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornPersonnel, HospitalPregnancyRisk FactorsSmokingSwedenCoffee

Identifiers

PMID2818973
PMCPMC1009792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.