Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28189592›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2017

Dissociable frontostriatal white matter connectivity underlies reward and motor impulsivity.

William H Hampton, Kylie H Alm, Vinod Venkatraman, Tehila Nugiel, Ingrid R Olson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of a 5-HTScientific reports · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Selective chemogenetic inactivation of corticoaccumbal projections disrupts trait choice impulsivity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Brain tract structure predicts relapse to stimulant drug use.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William H HamptonDepartment of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, Temple University, USA; Decision Neuroscience, College of Liberal Arts, Temple University, USA.
Kylie H AlmDepartment of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, Temple University, USA.
Vinod VenkatramanDepartment of Marketing & Supply Chain Management, Fox School of Business, Temple University, USA; Decision Neuroscience, College of Liberal Arts, Temple University, USA.
Tehila NugielDepartment of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, Temple University, USA.
Ingrid R OlsonDepartment of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts, Temple University, USA; Decision Neuroscience, College of Liberal Arts, Temple University, USA. Electronic address: iolson@temple.edu.
Temple University · US

Funding

The Neural Basis of Social KnowledgeR01MH091113 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI OLSON, INGRID R · 2010 to 2019
$3.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysfunction of cognitive control often leads to impulsive decision-making in clinical and healthy populations. Some research suggests that a generalized cognitive control mechanism underlies the ability to modulate various types of impulsive behavior, while other evidence suggests different forms of impulsivity are dissociable, and rely on distinct neural circuitry. Past research consistently implicates several brain regions, such as the striatum and portions of the prefrontal cortex, in impulsive behavior. However the ventral and dorsal striatum are distinct in regards to function and connectivity. Nascent evidence points to the importance of frontostriatal white matter connectivity in impulsivity, yet it remains unclear whether particular tracts relate to different control behaviors. Here we used probabilistic tractography of diffusion imaging data to relate ventral and dorsal frontostriatal connectivity to reward and motor impulsivity measures. We found a double dissociation such that individual differences in white matter connectivity between the ventral striatum and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was associated with reward impulsivity, as measured by delay discounting, whereas connectivity between dorsal striatum and supplementary motor area was associated with motor impulsivity, but not vice versa. Our findings suggest that (a) structural connectivity can is associated with a large amount of behavioral variation; (b) different types of impulsivity are driven by dissociable frontostriatal neural circuitry.

Indexed as

AdolescentCorpus StriatumDelay DiscountingDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImpulsive BehaviorMaleMotor ActivityNeural PathwaysPrefrontal CortexRewardWhite MatterYoung AdultDecision makingImpulsivityRewardVentral striatumWhite matter

Identifiers

PMID28189592
PMCPMC5494201
OpenAlexW2740308466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.