ReviewBiotechnology progress2017
Applied in situ product recovery in ABE fermentation.
Review in Biotechnology progress, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- One-pot bioprocessing: dynamics and opportunities for integrated multiproduct recovery-a review.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026Review
- Valorization of milling byproducts and ergot-sclerotia-contaminated rye via clostridial ABE fermentation.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2024Article
- Benzenoid Aromatics from Renewable Resources.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Growth-coupled anaerobic production of isobutanol from glucose in minimal medium with Escherichia coli.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2023Article
- A Review on Opportunities and Limitations of Membrane Bioreactor Configuration in Biofuel Production.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2023Review
- PEBA/PDMS Composite Multilayer Hollow Fiber Membranes for the Selective Separation of Butanol by Pervaporation.Membranes · 2022Article
- Process Development in Biosurfactant Production.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2022Review
- Parallel bioreactor system for accessible and reproducible anaerobic culture.Access microbiology · 2021Article
- Overview of Current Developments in Biobutanol Production Methods and Future Perspectives.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Review
- Reviving the Weizmann process for commercial n-butanol production.Nature communications · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The production of biobutanol is hindered by the product's toxicity to the bacteria, which limits the productivity of the process. In situ product recovery of butanol can improve the productivity by removing the source of inhibition. This paper reviews in situ product recovery techniques applied to the acetone butanol ethanol fermentation in a stirred tank reactor. Methods of in situ recovery include gas stripping, vacuum fermentation, pervaporation, liquid-liquid extraction, perstraction, and adsorption, all of which have been investigated for the acetone, butanol, and ethanol fermentation. All techniques have shown an improvement in substrate utilization, yield, productivity or both. Different fermentation modes favored different techniques. For batch processing gas stripping and pervaporation were most favorable, but in fed-batch fermentations gas stripping and adsorption were most promising. During continuous processing perstraction appeared to offer the best improvement. The use of hybrid techniques can increase the final product concentration beyond that of single-stage techniques. Therefore, the selection of an in situ product recovery technique would require comparable information on the energy demand and economics of the process. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 33:563-579, 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.