Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28188604›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2017

"Contextualizing Context": Reconciling Environmental Exposures, Social Networks, and Location Preferences in Health Research.

Yan Kestens, Rania Wasfi, Alexandre Naud, Basile Chaix

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Mental Health and Addiction: New Times and Challenges.International journal of mental health and addiction · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Feasibility and Validity of Geographically Explicit Ecological Momentary Assessment With Recall-Aided Space-Time Budgets.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yan KestensMontreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), 850, rue St-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada. yan.kestens@umontreal.ca.
Rania WasfiMontreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), 850, rue St-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada.
Alexandre NaudMontreal University Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM), 850, rue St-Denis, Montréal, Québec, H2X 0A9, Canada.
Basile ChaixInserm, UMR-S 1136, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Nemesis team, Paris, France.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe aim of this paper is to review the recent advances in health and place research and discuss concepts useful to explore how context affects health. More specifically, it reviews measures and tools used to account for place; concepts relating to daily mobility and multiple exposure to places, and further points to the intertwining between social and spatial networks to help further our understanding of how context translates into health profiles. RECENT

findingsSignificant advances in environmental or neighborhood effects have been made in the last decades. Specifically, conceptual and methodological developments have improved our consideration of spatial processes, shifting from a residential-based view of context to a more dynamic activity space and daily mobility paradigm. Yet, such advances have led to overlooking other potentially important aspects related to social networks and decision-making processes. With an increasing capacity to collect high-precision data on daily mobility and behavior, new possibilities in understanding how environments relate to behavior and health inequalities arise. Two overlooked aspects need to be addressed: the questions of "with or for whom", and "why". While the former calls for a better consideration of social networks and social interactions, the latter calls for refining our understanding of place preference and decision-making leading to daily mobility and multiple exposures.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureResidence CharacteristicsSocial SupportBiomedical ResearchEnvironmental HealthHumansSocial EnvironmentSpatio-Temporal AnalysisCausalityDaily mobilityEnvironmental exposureNeighborhood effectsSocial networksSpatial decision-making

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.