ReviewCurrent urology reports2017
Should Small Renal Masses Be Biopsied?
Review in Current urology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Small Renal Masses without Gross Fat: What Is the Role of Contrast-Enhanced MDCT?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Incidence of childhood renal tumours: An international population-based study.International journal of cancer · 2020Article
- Renal tumor biopsy: indicators, technique, safety, accuracy results, and impact on treatment decision management.World journal of urology · 2019Review
- Identifying the use and barriers to the adoption of renal tumour biopsy in the management of small renal masses.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2018Article
- Renal cell cancer treatment: the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG) surgery-focused consensus update.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last few decades, the incidence of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) has been steadily increasing. This is primarily due to an increase in detection of small renal masses (SRMs) as a result of widespread utilization of abdominal imaging. Interestingly, up to 30% of incidentally discovered SRMs (solid lesions measuring ≤4 cm) are benign, and consequently, the definitive treatment of all SRMs is associated with a considerable risk of overtreatment. To decrease the overtreatment rate, renal tumour biopsy (RTB) has been advocated as a safe alternative to identify the pretreatment histology of these SRMs. Although initially fraught with high non-diagnostic rates, more recent series from centres of experience have demonstrated that RTB is safe, reliable and accurate. The future of SRM management will combine pathological, molecular and genetic information to improve our ability to predict the behaviour of these lesions and herald risk-adapted personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.