Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28188559›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2017

Identification of Dyslipidemic Patients Attending Primary Care Clinics Using Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) Database.

Erfan Aref-Eshghi, Justin Oake, Marshall Godwin, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Pauline Duke, Masoud Mahdavian, Shabnam Asghari

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Identifying people with multiple sclerosis in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinical
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erfan Aref-EshghiFaculty of Medicine, Center for Rural Health Studies, Agnes Cowan Hostel, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Room 425, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
Justin OakeFaculty of Medicine, Center for Rural Health Studies, Agnes Cowan Hostel, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Room 425, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
Marshall GodwinPrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Kris Aubrey-BasslerFaculty of Medicine, Center for Rural Health Studies, Agnes Cowan Hostel, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Room 425, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
Pauline DukePrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Masoud MahdavianDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Shabnam AsghariFaculty of Medicine, Center for Rural Health Studies, Agnes Cowan Hostel, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Room 425, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada. shabnam.asghari@med.mun.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to define the optimal algorithm to identify patients with dyslipidemia using electronic medical records (EMRs). EMRs of patients attending primary care clinics in St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), Canada during 2009-2010, were studied to determine the best algorithm for identification of dyslipidemia. Six algorithms containing three components, dyslipidemia ICD coding, lipid lowering medication use, and abnormal laboratory lipid levels, were tested against a gold standard, defined as the existence of any of the three criteria. Linear discriminate analysis, and bootstrapping were performed following sensitivity/specificity testing and receiver's operating curve analysis. Two validating datasets, NL records of 2011-2014, and Canada-wide records of 2010-2012, were used to replicate the results. Relative to the gold standard, combining laboratory data together with lipid lowering medication consumption yielded the highest sensitivity (99.6%), NPV (98.1%), Kappa agreement (0.98), and area under the curve (AUC, 0.998). The linear discriminant analysis for this combination resulted in an error rate of 0.15 and an Eigenvalue of 1.99, and the bootstrapping led to AUC: 0.998, 95% confidence interval: 0.997-0.999, Kappa: 0.99. This algorithm in the first validating dataset yielded a sensitivity of 97%, Negative Predictive Value (NPV) = 83%, Kappa = 0.88, and AUC = 0.98. These figures for the second validating data set were 98%, 93%, 0.95, and 0.99, respectively. Combining laboratory data with lipid lowering medication consumption within the EMR is the best algorithm for detecting dyslipidemia. These results can generate standardized information systems for dyslipidemia and other chronic disease investigations using EMRs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSentinel SurveillanceCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesDyslipidemiasElectronic Health RecordsHumansHypolipidemic AgentsLipidsPrimary Health CareHypolipidemic AgentsLipidsAlgorithmData miningDyslipidemiaElectronic medical records

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.