ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2017
Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET.
Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive cardiac imaging modalities in patients with a history of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2024Pooled it
- Advances in Myocardial Perfusion MR Imaging: Physiological Implications, the Importance of Quantitative Analysis, and Impact on Patient Care in Coronary Artery Disease.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of PET-derived myocardial blood flow parameters: A meta-analysis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Pooled it
- Temporal Changes in Coronary Hyperemic and Resting Hemodynamic Indices in Nonculprit Vessels of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.JAMA cardiology · 2019Trial
- A proposal of an echocardiography-based pathway for the diagnosis and management of angina with no obstructive coronary arteries: a state-of-the-art review: Advancing Targeted Therapy and Prognosis Through Endotype Identification.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Review
- Whole-Body Dynamic Positron Emission and Computed Tomography (WBD-PET/CT): Latest Developments, Challenges and Opportunities.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Achieved lipid levels and long-term myocardial perfusion assessed by serial CZT-SPECT in post-PCI anterior myocardial infarction.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Data-Driven Motion Correction Algorithm: Validation in [Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of myocardial flow reserve quantification with single photon emission computed tomography - a systematic review and meta-analysis.EJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Semi-quantitative Analysis of Right Ventricular Myocardial First-pass Perfusion Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Systemic Sclerosis and Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Academic radiology · 2025Article
- Transient ischemic dilation ratio by [The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Protocol optimization and myocardial blood flow quantification in dynamic myocardial perfusion CT-where do we stand?European radiology · 2025Article
- Myocardial perfusion imaging in advanced coronary artery disease.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025Review
- Synthesis and preliminary evaluation of cardiac imaging with [RSC pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Impact of myocardial scar burden on microvascular resistance reserve in patients with coronary artery disease.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Inter-Software Reproducibility of Quantitative Values of Myocardial Blood Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Acquired by [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison of global and regional myocardial blood flow quantification using dynamic solid-state detector SPECT and Tc-99 m-sestamibi or Tc-99 m-tetrofosmin in a routine clinical setting.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Letter to the Editor: EANM position paper on challenges and opportunities of full-ring 360° CZT bone imaging: it's time to let go of planar whole-body bone imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Diagnostic performance of quantitative perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with prior coronary artery disease.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2025Article
- Evaluation and clinical applicability of angiography-derived assessment of coronary microcirculatory resistance: a [The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease remains a challenging task, with a large armamentarium of diagnostic modalities. Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is widely used for this purpose whereby cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) is considered the gold standard. Next to relative radiotracer distribution, PET allows for measurement of absolute myocardial blood flow. This quantification of perfusion improves diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value. Cardiac hybrid imaging relies on the fusion of anatomical and functional imaging using coronary computed tomography angiography and MPI, respectively, and provides incremental value as compared with either stand-alone modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.