Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28188406›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2017

Comparative study of plication-recession versus resection-recession in unilateral surgery for intermittent exotropia.

Yugo Kimura, Tohru Kimura

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Plication or resection combined with antagonist recession in horizontal strabismus.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Comitant strabismus etiology: extraocular muscle integrity and central nervous system involvement-a narrative review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yugo KimuraKimura Eye and Internal Medicine Hospital, 3-15 Takaramachi, Kure, Hiroshima, 737-0029, Japan. ky.kimuraeye@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6620-2540
Tohru KimuraKimura Eye and Internal Medicine Hospital, 3-15 Takaramachi, Kure, Hiroshima, 737-0029, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePlication is a muscle-strengthening procedure in which a muscle is not dissected from its point of insertion. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of plication-recession (PR) with those of resection-recession (RR) in adult patients with intermittent exotropia (XT).

methodsPatients with XT who underwent either PR or RR with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 12 months were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative mean distance deviation and surgical outcomes were compared at 1 week and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and at the final follow-up. A successful outcome was defined as esophoria or esotropia ≤5 PD (prism diopters) to exophoria or exotropia ≤10 PD.

resultsForty-five patients underwent PR and 43 underwent RR. The mean preoperative distance deviation was 40.1 ± 12.9 PD in the PR group and 40.0 ± 14.9 PD in the RR group (P = 0.96). Mean follow-up was 21.0 ± 7.6 months for PR and 24.0 ± 8.6 months for RR (P = 0.08). The mean postoperative distance deviation at 12 months was 8.3 ± 7.4 PD for PR and 9.9 ± 9.6 PD for RR (P = 0.38). PR had a significantly better outcome than RR at 1 week (PR 89%; RR 72%; P = 0.04), but there was no difference between PR and RR at 12 months (PR 67%; RR 60%; P = 0.50).

conclusionPR and RR achieved comparable distance deviation and success rates at 12 months. PR had a better short-term success rate, and might prevent postoperative diplopia caused by overcorrection.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overExotropiaEye MovementsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOculomotor MusclesOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesExotropiaPlicationRecessionResectionSurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.