Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28188404›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2017

[Direct oral anticoagulants and acute stroke : Insights into translational research studies].

C Foerch, J H Schäfer, W Pfeilschifter, F Bohmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C FoerchKlinik für Neurologie, Goethe-Universität, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland. foerch@em.uni-frankfurt.de.
J H SchäferKlinik für Neurologie, Goethe-Universität, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
W PfeilschifterKlinik für Neurologie, Goethe-Universität, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
F BohmannKlinik für Neurologie, Goethe-Universität, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years a considerable number of translational research studies on intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke have been published, which are characterized by a particular proximity to practical clinical questions. Animal research has provided insights into the pathophysiological processes and therapy effects, which have so far only been insufficiently investigated in clinical studies. This includes the effectiveness of a rapid reversal of anticoagulation in cases of anticoagulation-associated intracerebral hemorrhage and the safety of thrombolytic treatment in ischemic stroke occurring during treatment with anticoagulants. With the approval of the direct oral anticoagulants these problems have become of particular contemporary relevance. Of course, results from experimental translational studies on stroke cannot be directly translated into clinical routine. Nevertheless, these investigations help to understand the underlying processes and mechanisms and provide proof of concept data for new treatment strategies. This review summarizes the most relevant results in this field of research with a particular focus on practical clinical questions.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnticoagulantsCerebral HemorrhageEvidence-Based MedicineHumansModels, CardiovascularStrokeTranslational Research, BiomedicalTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsAnimal modelExperimental researchIntracerebral hemorrhageIschemic strokeThrombolysis

Identifiers

PMID28188404
OpenAlexW2586399484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.