Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28188264›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2017

Immortalized human myotonic dystrophy muscle cell lines to assess therapeutic compounds.

Ludovic Arandel, Micaela Polay Espinoza, Magdalena Matloka, Audrey Bazinet, Damily De Dea Diniz, Naïra Naouar, Frédérique Rau, Arnaud Jollet, Frédérique Edom-Vovard, Kamel Mamchaoui and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Delpacibart etedesiran improves the molecular pathology of myotonic dystrophy type 1 in the phase 1/2 MARINA study.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. miR-107 repressesMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Characterization ofNAR molecular medicine · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ludovic ArandelSorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Institut de Myologie, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris 75013, France.
Micaela Polay EspinozaSorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Institut de Myologie, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris 75013, France.
Magdalena MatlokaSorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Institut de Myologie, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris 75013, France.
Audrey BazinetSorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Institut de Myologie, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris 75013, France.
Damily De Dea DinizSorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Institut de Myologie, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris 75013, France.
Naïra NaouarSorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Institut de Myologie, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris 75013, France.
Frédérique RauSorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Institut de Myologie, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris 75013, France.
Arnaud JolletSorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Institut de Myologie, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris 75013, France.
Frédérique Edom-VovardSorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Institut de Myologie, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris 75013, France.
Kamel MamchaouiSorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Institut de Myologie, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris 75013, France.
Mark TarnopolskyMcMaster University Medical Center, Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, 1200 Main St W., Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3Z5.
Jack PuymiratCHU de Quebec, site Enfant-Jésus, Université Laval, Québec, Canada G1J 1Z4.
Christophe BattailCentre National de Génotypage, Institut de Génomique, CEA, 91000 Evry, France.
Anne BolandCentre National de Génotypage, Institut de Génomique, CEA, 91000 Evry, France.
Jean-Francois DeleuzeCentre National de Génotypage, Institut de Génomique, CEA, 91000 Evry, France.
Vincent MoulySorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Institut de Myologie, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris 75013, France.
Arnaud F KleinSorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Institut de Myologie, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris 75013, France.
Denis FurlingSorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Myologie, Institut de Myologie, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris 75013, France denis.furling@upmc.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7912-4409
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRMcMaster University Medical Centre · CAUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and type 2 (DM2) are autosomal dominant neuromuscular diseases caused by microsatellite expansions and belong to the family of RNA-dominant disorders. Availability of cellular models in which the DM mutation is expressed within its natural context is essential to facilitate efforts to identify new therapeutic compounds. Here, we generated immortalized DM1 and DM2 human muscle cell lines that display nuclear RNA aggregates of expanded repeats, a hallmark of myotonic dystrophy. Selected clones of DM1 and DM2 immortalized myoblasts behave as parental primary myoblasts with a reduced fusion capacity of immortalized DM1 myoblasts when compared with control and DM2 cells. Alternative splicing defects were observed in differentiated DM1 muscle cell lines, but not in DM2 lines. Splicing alterations did not result from differentiation delay because similar changes were found in immortalized DM1 transdifferentiated fibroblasts in which myogenic differentiation has been forced by overexpression of MYOD1. As a proof-of-concept, we show that antisense approaches alleviate disease-associated defects, and an RNA-seq analysis confirmed that the vast majority of mis-spliced events in immortalized DM1 muscle cells were affected by antisense treatment, with half of them significantly rescued in treated DM1 cells. Immortalized DM1 muscle cell lines displaying characteristic disease-associated molecular features such as nuclear RNA aggregates and splicing defects can be used as robust readouts for the screening of therapeutic compounds. Therefore, immortalized DM1 and DM2 muscle cell lines represent new models and tools to investigate molecular pathophysiological mechanisms and evaluate the

Indexed as

Drug Evaluation, PreclinicalAdultAlternative SplicingCell Line, TransformedChildFemaleFibroblastsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle, SkeletalMyoD ProteinMyotonic DystrophyOligonucleotides, AntisenseRNAMyoD ProteinOligonucleotides, AntisenseRNAAlternative splicingExpanded repeatsMuscle cell lineMyotonic dystrophyNuclear aggregatesTherapeutic compounds

Identifiers

PMID28188264
PMCPMC5399563
OpenAlexW2586871870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.