Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28187918›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of emergency medicine2017

Diazepam Is No Better Than Placebo When Added to Naproxen for Acute Low Back Pain.

Benjamin W Friedman, Eddie Irizarry, Clemencia Solorzano, Nauman Khankel, Jennifer Zapata, Eleftheria Zias, E John Gallagher

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03953625 (Interest of the Return to Primary Care of the "Low Back Booklet" of Health Insurance in the Recovery of Common Acute Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03953625 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Interest of the Return to Primary Care of the "Low Back Booklet" of Health Insurance in the Recovery of Common Acute Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondation Hôpital Saint-JosephRan2018 to 2021Enrolled33ConditionsLow Back PainArmsdelivery of the low back pain booklet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Analgesia for non-specific low back pain.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. What a pain in the … back: a review of current treatment options with a focus on naproxen sodium.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin W FriedmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY. Electronic address: bwfriedmanmd@gmail.com.
Eddie IrizarryDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Clemencia SolorzanoDepartment of Pharmacy, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Nauman KhankelDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Jennifer ZapataDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Eleftheria ZiasDepartment of Pharmacy, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
E John GallagherDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USMontefiore Medical Center · US

Funding

Core-010UL1TR001073 · NCATS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI KELLER, MARLA J, SHAMOON, HARRY · 2013 to 2017
$21.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveLow back pain causes more than 2.5 million visits to US emergency departments (EDs) annually. Low back pain patients are often treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and benzodiazepines. The former is an evidence-based intervention, whereas the efficacy of the latter has not been established. We compare pain and functional outcomes 1 week and 3 months after ED discharge among patients randomized to a 1-week course of naproxen+diazepam versus naproxen+placebo.

methodsThis was a randomized, double-blind, comparative efficacy clinical trial conducted in an urban health care system. Patients presenting with acute, nontraumatic, nonradicular low back pain of no more than a duration of 2 weeks were eligible for enrollment immediately before discharge from an ED if they had a score greater than 5 on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, a validated 24-item inventory of functional impairment caused by low back pain. Higher scores on the questionnaire indicate greater functional disability. The primary outcome in the trial was improvement in the score between ED discharge and 1 week later. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity 1 week and 3 months after ED discharge, as measured on a 4-point descriptive scale (severe, moderate, mild, and none). All patients were given 20 tablets of naproxen 500 mg, to be taken twice a day as needed for low back pain. Additionally, patients were randomized to receive either 28 tablets of diazepam 5 mg or identical placebo, to be received as 1 or 2 tablets every 12 hours as needed for low back pain. All patients received a standardized 10-minute low back pain educational session before discharge. Using a between-group mean difference of 5 Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire points, a previously validated threshold for clinical significance, we calculated the need for at least 100 patients with primary outcome data.

resultsEnrollment began in June 2015 and continued for 9 months. Five hundred forty-five patients were screened for eligibility. One hundred fourteen patients met selection criteria and were randomized. Baseline demographic characteristics were not substantially different between the 2 groups. One hundred twelve patients (98%) provided 1-week outcome data. The mean Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score of patients randomized to naproxen+diazepam improved by 11 (95% confidence interval [CI] 9 to 13), as did the mean score of patients randomized to naproxen+placebo (11; 95% CI 8 to 13). At 1-week follow-up, 18 of 57 diazepam patients (32%; 95% CI 21% to 45%) reported moderate or severe low back pain versus 12 of 55 placebo patients (22%; 95% CI 13% to 35%). At 3-month follow-up, 6 of 50 diazepam patients (12%; 95% CI 5% to 24%) reported moderate or severe low back pain versus 5 of 53 placebo patients (9%; 95% CI 4% to 21%). Adverse events were reported by 12 of 57 diazepam patients (21%; 95% CI 12% to 33%) and 8 of 55 placebo patients (15%; 95% CI 7% to 26%).

conclusionAmong ED patients with acute, nontraumatic, nonradicular low back pain, naproxen+diazepam did not improve functional outcomes or pain compared with naproxen+placebo 1 week and 3 months after ED discharge.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalAdultAgedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiazepamDisability EvaluationDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedNaproxenPain MeasurementAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDiazepamNaproxen

Identifiers

PMID28187918
PMCPMC5517351
OpenAlexW2586554770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.