ArticleArthritis research & therapy2017
Development of three-dimensional prints of arthritic joints for supporting patients' awareness to structural damage.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography for Bone Evaluation in Inflammatory Rheumatic Disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Pooled it
- 3D Bioprinting Strategies in Autoimmune Disease Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- From image to insight: leveraging imaging to empower patients with inflammatory arthropathies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- ["Rheuma (be-)greifen"- A multimodal teaching concept to improve rheumatology education for medical students].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2024Article
- The Disruption of Trust in the Digital Transformation Leading to Health 4.0.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Cinematic rendering in rheumatic diseases-Photorealistic depiction of pathologies improves disease understanding for patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- [Online ultrasound learning modules in rheumatology : Innovative elective course increases student interest in the discipline of rheumatology].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2020Article
- ["Virtual rheumatology" : A new teaching concept for rheumatology of the future?]Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2019Article
- Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 3D printing Special Interest Group (SIG): guidelines for medical 3D printing and appropriateness for clinical scenarios.3D printing in medicine · 2018Article
- Patient-Specific 3-Dimensional Modeling and Its Use for Preoperative Counseling of Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) result in severe joint destruction and functional disability if left untreated. We aim to develop tools that help patients with RA and PsA to understand and experience the impact of inflammatory joint disease on the integrity of their (juxta-articular) bone and increase adherence to medical treatment. In this study, we used high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to develop 3D prototypes of patients' finger joints.
methodsHR-pQCT (XtremeCT, Scanco) measurements were performed in healthy individuals and patients with inflammatory joint disease, followed by a 3D print using the objet30 printer. Healthy participants (n = 10), and patients (n = 15 with RA and 15 with PsA) underwent a detailed, standardized interview with demonstration of printed joints.
resultsUtilizing HR-pQCT images of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) heads, high quality and exact 3D prints as prototypes were created. Erosions in different sizes and the trabecular network printed in detail were visualized, demonstrating structural reduction in arthritic vs. healthy bone. After demonstration of 3D prints (healthy vs. erosive joint, visual and haptic) 26/39 (66%) participants (including healthy volunteers) were deeply affected, often quoting "shock". Of the patients with RA and PsA, 13/15 (86%) and 11/15 (73%), respectively, stated that they would rethink their attitude to medication adherence. More importantly, 21/24 patients with RA or PsA (87.5%) expressed that they would have wished to see such 3D prints during their first disease-specific conversations.
conclusionUsing arthro-haptic 3D printed prototypes of joints may help to better understand the impact of inflammatory arthritides on bone integrity and long-term damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.