Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28187745›Full record

SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2017

A systematic review of undisplaced femoral neck fracture treatments for patients over 65 years of age, with a focus on union rates and avascular necrosis.

Dan-Feng Xu, Fang-Gang Bi, Chi-Yuan Ma, Zheng-Fa Wen, Xun-Zi Cai

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development and testing of a prognostic scoring system for screw-positioning related femoral neck fracture failures for younger adults.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Comparable results for the Femoral Neck System and three-screw fixation in femoral neck fracture treatment.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dan-Feng XuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Jie-fang Road 88, Hangzhou, 310009, People's Republic of China.
Fang-Gang BiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, People's Republic of China.
Chi-Yuan MaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Jie-fang Road 88, Hangzhou, 310009, People's Republic of China.
Zheng-Fa WenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, 322000, People's Republic of China.
Xun-Zi CaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Jie-fang Road 88, Hangzhou, 310009, People's Republic of China. emilcai@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt remains unclear whether conservative treatment should be used to treat the common undisplaced femoral neck fractures that develop in the elderly. Herein, we systematically review the rates of union and avascular necrosis after conservative and surgical treatment of undisplaced femoral neck fractures.

methodsWe searched the EMBASE, PubMed, OVID, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for randomized controlled trials or observational studies that assessed the outcomes of conservative or surgical treatments of undisplaced femoral neck fractures. No language or publication year limitation was imposed. Statistical analyses were performed with the aid of the chi-squared test. We evaluated the quality of each publication and the risk of bias.

resultsTwenty-nine studies involving 5071 patients were ultimately included; 1120 patients were treated conservatively and 3951 surgically. The union rates were 68.8% (642/933) and 92.6% (635/686) in the former and latter groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The avascular necrosis rate in the conservatively treated group was 10.3% (39/380), while it was 7.7% (159/2074) in the surgically treated group (p = 0.09).

conclusionsSurgery to treat undisplaced femoral neck fractures was associated with a higher union rate and a tendency toward less avascular necrosis than conservative treatment.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemoral Neck FracturesFemur Head NecrosisFracture Fixation, InternalFracture HealingHumansOsteoporotic FracturesAvascular necrosisConservative treatmentNon-unionSecondary displacementSurgical treatmentUndisplaced femoral neck fracture

Identifiers

PMID28187745
PMCPMC5301374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.