Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28187724›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Case management of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional survey in Chongqing, China.

Miao He, Jiaqi Gao, Weiwei Liu, Xiaojun Tang, Shenglan Tang, Qian Long

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Miao HeSchool of Public Health and Management, Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, Research Center for Medicine and Social Development, Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Yixueyuan Road, Chongqing, Yuzhong district, 400016, People's Republic of China.
Jiaqi GaoSchool of Public Health and Management, Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, Research Center for Medicine and Social Development, Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Yixueyuan Road, Chongqing, Yuzhong district, 400016, People's Republic of China.
Weiwei LiuSchool of Public Health and Management, Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, Research Center for Medicine and Social Development, Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Yixueyuan Road, Chongqing, Yuzhong district, 400016, People's Republic of China.
Xiaojun TangSchool of Public Health and Management, Collaborative Innovation Center of Social Risks Governance in Health, Research Center for Medicine and Social Development, Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Yixueyuan Road, Chongqing, Yuzhong district, 400016, People's Republic of China. tangxiaoj0726@qq.com.
Shenglan TangDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Qian LongDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Chongqing Medical University · CNChongqing Public Health Medical Center · CNDuke Institute for Health Innovation · USDuke Kunshan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus has been identified as one of the priority diseases and included in the essential public health service package in China. This study investigated the frequency of follow-up visits and contents of care for case management of patients with Type 2 diabetes in Chongqing located in the western China, in terms of the regional practice guideline; and analyzed factors associated with the use of care.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted with patients diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes in two areas in Chongqing. Total 502 participants (out of 664 people eligible) completed the interview. The outcome measures included at least four follow-up visits in a year, annual HbA1c test, blood lipid test and diabetic screening for nephropathy and eyes. Logistic regression analysis was applied to examine the association between participants' demographic and socio-economic characteristics and outcome measures.

resultsOver the one-year study period, 65% of participants had four or more follow-up visits. In light of the recommended tests, the proportions of having HbA1c test, blood lipid test and screening for nephropathy and eyes annually were 8, 54, 45 and 44%, respectively. After adjusting for study sites, age, sex, education, type of residence, level of income, the patients who were covered by Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance, were enrolled in the targeted disease reimbursement program, and lived with diabetes more than five years were more likely to have regular follow-up visits and the recommended tests.

conclusionsCase management for patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus was not effectively implemented in terms of frequency of follow-up visits and recommended tests over one-year period, as indicated in the regional practice guideline.

Indexed as

Case ManagementAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansLipidsMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesLipidsChinaChronic disease case managementComplianceType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID28187724
PMCPMC5303217
OpenAlexW2586878962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.