Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28187716›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

The abundance of homoeologue transcripts is disrupted by hybridization and is partially restored by genome doubling in synthetic hexaploid wheat.

Ming Hao, Aili Li, Tongwei Shi, Jiangtao Luo, Lianquan Zhang, Xuechuan Zhang, Shunzong Ning, Zhongwei Yuan, Deying Zeng, Xingchen Kong and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A breeding strategy targeting the secondary gene pool of bread wheat: introgression from a synthetic hexaploid wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ming HaoTriticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, China.
Aili LiNational Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.
Tongwei ShiBiomarker Technologies Corporation, Beijing, 101300, China.
Jiangtao LuoTriticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, China.
Lianquan ZhangTriticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, China.
Xuechuan ZhangBiomarker Technologies Corporation, Beijing, 101300, China.
Shunzong NingTriticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, China.
Zhongwei YuanTriticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, China.
Deying ZengTriticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, China.
Xingchen KongTriticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, China.
Xiaolong LiTriticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, China.
Hongkun ZhengBiomarker Technologies Corporation, Beijing, 101300, China.
Xiujin LanTriticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, China.
Huaigang ZhangKey Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, 810001, China.
Youliang ZhengTriticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, China.
Long MaoNational Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China. maolong@caas.cn.
Dengcai LiuTriticeae Research Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 611130, China. dcliu7@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe formation of an allopolyploid is a two step process, comprising an initial wide hybridization event, which is later followed by a whole genome doubling. Both processes can affect the transcription of homoeologues. Here, RNA-Seq was used to obtain the genome-wide leaf transcriptome of two independent Triticum turgidum × Aegilops tauschii allotriploids (F1), along with their spontaneous allohexaploids (S1) and their parental lines. The resulting sequence data were then used to characterize variation in homoeologue transcript abundance.

resultsThe hybridization event strongly down-regulated D-subgenome homoeologues, but this effect was in many cases reversed by whole genome doubling. The suppression of D-subgenome homoeologue transcription resulted in a marked frequency of parental transcription level dominance, especially with respect to genes encoding proteins involved in photosynthesis. Singletons (genes where no homoeologues were present) were frequently transcribed at both the allotriploid and allohexaploid plants.

conclusionsThe implication is that whole genome doubling helps to overcome the phenotypic weakness of the allotriploid, restoring a more favourable gene dosage in genes experiencing transcription level dominance in hexaploid wheat.

Indexed as

Hybridization, GeneticPolyploidySequence Homology, Nucleic AcidDown-RegulationGenome, PlantPhenotypeRNA, MessengerTriticumRNA, MessengerGenome duplicationInterspecific hybridizationPolyploidySynthetic wheatTranscriptome evolution

Identifiers

PMID28187716
PMCPMC5303294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.