Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28187533›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Comparison of analytic performances of Cellsearch and iFISH approach in detecting circulating tumor cells.

Yuan Sheng, Ting Wang, Hengyu Li, Zhenzhen Zhang, Jianghao Chen, Chenyang He, Yongping Li, Yonggang Lv, Juliang Zhang, Cheng Xu and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Noninvasive circulating tumor cell and urine cellularTranslational cancer research · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Epithelial membrane protein 2: a novel biomarker for circulating tumor cell recovery in breast cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yuan ShengDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ting WangDepartment of Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Hengyu LiDepartment of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zhenzhen ZhangBiotecan Medical Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Zhangjiang Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jianghao ChenDepartment of Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Chenyang HeDepartment of Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yongping LiDepartment of Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yonggang LvDepartment of Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Juliang ZhangDepartment of Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Cheng XuBiotecan Medical Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Zhangjiang Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai,China.
Zhen WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Chen HuangDepartment of Nephrology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Ling WangDepartment of Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been widely used to predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to compare the performances of Cellsearch and immunostaining-fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) in detecting CTCs in breast cancer patients. Forty-five newly diagnosed breast cancer patients and 14 healthy donors were recruited and their CTCs were detected by both Cellsearch and iFISH. Correlation between clinicopathological features and CTCs was investigated. We found that the positive rate of CTC detected by iFISH was significantly higher than by Cellsearch system (91% vs 38%). The CTC count, detected either by iFISH or Cellsearch, was not significantly associated with clinical pictures of patients with breast cancer. Therefore, we concluded that, compared to conventional Cellsearch CTC detection, in situ karyotypic identification performed by iFISH had higher detection rate. Therefore, iFISH may be more clinically useful than Cellsearch system.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, HumanFluorescent Antibody TechniqueIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceAdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansKaryotypeKaryotypingKeratinsMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorEPCAM protein, humanEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesKeratinsVimentinaneuploidybreast cancercellsearchcirculating tumor cells (CTC)subtraction enrichment

Identifiers

PMID28187533
PMCPMC5352443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.