ArticleJournal of integrative bioinformatics2016
SBML Level 3 package: Groups, Version 1 Release 1.
Article in Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- MCC: automated mass and charge curation at the genome scale applied toMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Genome-scale metabolic model ofmSystems · 2025Article
- Specifications of standards in systems and synthetic biology: status, developments, and tools in 2024.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Article
- Simultaneous application of enzyme and thermodynamic constraints to metabolic models using an updated Python implementation of GECKO.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- An integrated systems biology approach reveals differences in formate metabolism in the genusiScience · 2023Article
- Specifications of standards in systems and synthetic biology: status and developments in 2021.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2021Article
- An updated genome-scale metabolic network reconstruction of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 to characterize mucin-driven shifts in bacterial metabolism.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2021Article
- First Genome-Scale Metabolic Model ofMetabolites · 2021Article
- MASSpy: Building, simulating, and visualizing dynamic biological models in Python using mass action kinetics.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- High-Quality Genome-Scale Reconstruction ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- SBML Level 3: an extensible format for the exchange and reuse of biological models.Molecular systems biology · 2020Review
- Specifications of standards in systems and synthetic biology: status and developments in 2020.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2020Article
- BiGG Models 2020: multi-strain genome-scale models and expansion across the phylogenetic tree.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- A systematic assessment of current genome-scale metabolic reconstruction tools.Genome biology · 2019Article
- Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology: Status and Developments in 2019.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology: Status and Developments in 2017.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology: Status and Developments in 2016.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological models often contain components that have relationships with each other, or that modelers want to treat as belonging to groups with common characteristics or shared metadata. The SBML Level 3 Version 1 Core specification does not provide an explicit mechanism for expressing such relationships, but it does provide a mechanism for SBML packages to extend the Core specification and add additional syntactical constructs. The SBML Groups package for SBML Level 3 adds the necessary features to SBML to allow grouping of model components to be expressed. Such groups do not affect the mathematical interpretation of a model, but they do provide a way to add information that can be useful for modelers and software tools. The SBML Groups package enables a modeler to include definitions of groups and nested groups, each of which may be annotated to convey why that group was created, and what it represents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.