ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2018
Retrospective analysis on the diagnostic performances and signal-to-cut-off ratios of the Elecsys Anti-HCV II assay.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of anti-HCV antibodies in the clinical classification and epidemiological surveillance of HCV infection.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Comparative evaluation of four fully automated immunoanalyzers for the simultaneous detection of HBeAg and Anti-HBe.PloS one · 2025Article
- Comparison of a dual antibody and antigen HCV immunoassay to standard of care algorithmic testing.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- Determination of hepatitis C virus subtype prevalent in Sindh, Pakistan: a phylogenetic analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The diagnostic significance of hepatitis C virus antibody levels for chronic hepatitis C virus infection.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluating the utility of a two-assay serological algorithm for hepatitis C screening in a low prevalence population.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2023Article
- The signal-to-cutoff ratios to predict HCV infection among people who inject drugs.Virusdisease · 2022Article
- The role of a two-assay serological testing strategy for anti-HCV screening in low-prevalence populations.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Clinical diagnostic performance of light-initiated chemiluminescent assay compared with the Architect chemiluminescence immunoassay for detection of HCV antibody.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2019Article
- Performance evaluation of the mindray anti-HCV assay for the detection of hepatitis C virus infection.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2018Article
- Retrospective analysis on the diagnostic performances and signal-to-cut-off ratios of the Elecsys Anti-HCV II assay.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnti-HCV assays are widely used as a screening tool for HCV infection. However, diagnostic performances and effective signal-to-cut-off ratios (S/COs) for predicting true HCV infections would vary according to the assays used. Thus, we evaluated the diagnostic performances of the new Elecsys Anti-HCV assay.
methodsA total of 41 694 cases tested by the Elecsys Anti-HCV II assay (Roche Diagnostics, Germany) during January 2013 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed by comparing with the diagnosis on HCV infections determined by patients' medical records and results of laboratory tests.
resultsExcluding 62 cases with unclear history of HCV infection, 430 and 41 202 cases were respectively assorted as "true infection" and "no evidence of infection," and 99.85% of the initial results by the Elecsys assay were concordant with the diagnosis on HCV infection. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were respectively 99.30%, 99.86%, 88.04%, and 99.99%, where the prevalence of the HCV infection was 1.0%. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve value of the Elecsys assay was 0.9980 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.9944 to 1.0017). The S/CO by the Elecsys assay for predictive of a true-positive ≥95% of the time was 19.0 (95% CI=15.0 to 25.1).
conclusionThe Elecsys Anti-HCV II assay showed excellent diagnostic performances, particularly in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and NPV. However, the results obtained by this assay with S/CO less than a certain value would need to be retested by HCV RNA PCR or another anti-HCV assay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.