Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28187198›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Two stable variants of Burkholderia pseudomallei strain MSHR5848 express broadly divergent in vitro phenotypes associated with their virulence differences.

A A Shea, R C Bernhards, C K Cote, C J Chase, J W Koehler, C P Klimko, J T Ladner, D A Rozak, M J Wolcott, D P Fetterer and 8 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Colony morphotype variation inJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Distinct Pathogenic Patterns ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A A SheaDiagnostic Systems Division, USAMRIID, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
R C BernhardsBacteriology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
C K CoteBacteriology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
C J ChaseDiagnostic Systems Division, USAMRIID, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
J W KoehlerDiagnostic Systems Division, USAMRIID, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
C P KlimkoBacteriology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
J T LadnerCenter for Genome Sciences, USAMRIID, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
D A RozakDiagnostic Systems Division, USAMRIID, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
M J WolcottDiagnostic Systems Division, USAMRIID, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
D P FettererBiostatistical Services Division, USAMRIID, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
S J KernBiostatistical Services Division, USAMRIID, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
G I KorolevaCenter for Genome Sciences, USAMRIID, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
S P LovettCenter for Genome Sciences, USAMRIID, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
G F PalaciosCenter for Genome Sciences, USAMRIID, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
R G ToothmanBacteriology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
J A BozueBacteriology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
P L WorshamBacteriology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
S L WelkosBacteriology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases · USHuman Genome Sciences (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burkholderia pseudomallei (Bp), the agent of melioidosis, causes disease ranging from acute and rapidly fatal to protracted and chronic. Bp is highly infectious by aerosol, can cause severe disease with nonspecific symptoms, and is naturally resistant to multiple antibiotics. However, no vaccine exists. Unlike many Bp strains, which exhibit random variability in traits such as colony morphology, Bp strain MSHR5848 exhibited two distinct and relatively stable colony morphologies on sheep blood agar plates: a smooth, glossy, pale yellow colony and a flat, rough, white colony. Passage of the two variants, designated "Smooth" and "Rough", under standard laboratory conditions produced cultures composed of > 99.9% of the single corresponding type; however, both could switch to the other type at different frequencies when incubated in certain nutritionally stringent or stressful growth conditions. These MSHR5848 derivatives were extensively characterized to identify variant-associated differences. Microscopic and colony morphology differences on six differential media were observed and only the Rough variant metabolized sugars in selective agar. Antimicrobial susceptibilities and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) features were characterized and phenotype microarray profiles revealed distinct metabolic and susceptibility disparities between the variants. Results using the phenotype microarray system narrowed the 1,920 substrates to a subset which differentiated the two variants. Smooth grew more rapidly in vitro than Rough, yet the latter exhibited a nearly 10-fold lower lethal dose for mice than Smooth. Finally, the Smooth variant was phagocytosed and replicated to a greater extent and was more cytotoxic than Rough in macrophages. In contrast, multiple locus sequence type (MLST) analysis, ribotyping, and whole genome sequence analysis demonstrated the variants' genetic conservation; only a single consistent genetic difference between the two was identified for further study. These distinct differences shown by two variants of a Bp strain will be leveraged to better understand the mechanism of Bp phenotypic variability and to possibly identify in vitro markers of infection.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialPhenotypePolymorphism, GeneticAnimalsBurkholderia pseudomalleiCell LineDrug Resistance, BacterialMacrophagesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CVirulence

Identifiers

PMID28187198
PMCPMC5302386
OpenAlexW2586557879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.