Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28186981›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

18F-FDG/18F-FES standardized uptake value ratio determined using PET predicts prognosis in uterine sarcoma.

Makoto Yamamoto, Tetsuya Tsujikawa, Shizuka Yamada, Tetsuji Kurokawa, Akiko Shinagawa, Yoko Chino, Tetsuya Mori, Yasushi Kiyono, Hidehiko Okazawa, Yoshio Yoshida

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic Value of 16α-Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Single-cell RNA-seq revealsFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  5. Annals of nuclear medicine · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Image Quality and Interpretation of [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Makoto YamamotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Tetsuya TsujikawaBiomedical Imaging Research Center, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Shizuka YamadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Tetsuji KurokawaBiomedical Imaging Research Center, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Akiko ShinagawaBiomedical Imaging Research Center, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Yoko ChinoBiomedical Imaging Research Center, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Tetsuya MoriBiomedical Imaging Research Center, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Yasushi KiyonoBiomedical Imaging Research Center, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Hidehiko OkazawaBiomedical Imaging Research Center, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
Yoshio YoshidaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.
University of Fukui · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated whether 16α-[18F]-fluoro-17β-estradiol (18F-FES) and 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) uptake measured using positron emission tomography (PET) predicted prognosis in 18 patients with different histological subtypes of uterine sarcoma. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) and 18F-FDG/18F-FES SUV ratios were determined, and their correlations with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined. Ten patients died from local recurrence or metastasis, and one more experienced recurrence, during the at least 36-month follow-up period. Patients with higher 18F-FDG SUVs (> 5.5) had worse OS (p = 0.007) and tended toward worse PFS (p = 0.11), while patients with lower 18F-FES SUVs (≤ 1.5) had worse PFS (p = 0.03) and tended toward worse OS (p = 0.19). Patients with 18F-FDG/18F-FES ratios > 2.6 had worse PFS (p = 0.009) and OS (p = 0.005). The 5-year PFS and OS rates were 75% and 88% for patients with lower ratios, but were only 10% and 20% for those with higher ratios. These results suggest that pretreatment tumor 18F-FDG/18F-FES ratio is useful for predicting the prognosis of uterine sarcoma patients.

Indexed as

EstradiolFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsSarcomaSurvival RateUterine Neoplasms16-fluoroestradiolEstradiolFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals18F-FDG PET18F-FES PETprognostic predictionuterine sarcoma

Identifiers

PMID28186981
PMCPMC5410246
OpenAlexW2587612892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.