Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28186948›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Patient and physician attitudes regarding risk and benefit in streamlined development programmes for antibacterial drugs: a qualitative analysis.

Thomas L Holland, Stephen Mikita, Diane Bloom, Jamie Roberts, Jonathan McCall, Deborah Collyar, Jonas Santiago, Rosemary Tiernan, Joseph Toerner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas L HollandDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Stephen MikitaPatient Advocates in Research (PAIR), Danville, California, USA.
Diane BloomInFocus Research, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jamie RobertsDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jonathan McCallDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Deborah CollyarPatient Advocates in Research (PAIR), Danville, California, USA.
Jonas SantiagoCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Rosemary TiernanCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Joseph ToernerCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Clinical Research Institute · USAdvocates for Youth · USCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

Increasing the Quality and Efficiency of Clinical Trials (R18)R18FD005292 · FDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JENNIFER S · 2014 to 2019
$26.8M
Clinical Trials Transformation InitiativeU19FD003800 · FDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CALIFF, ROBERT · 2009 to 2013
$8.5M
FDA HHS R18 FD005292FDA HHS U19 FD003800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore patient, caregiver and physician perceptions and attitudes regarding the balance of benefit and risk in using antibacterial drugs developed through streamlined development processes.

designSemistructured focus groups and in-depth interviews were conducted to elicit perceptions and attitudes about the use of antibacterial drugs to treat multidrug-resistant infections. Participants were given background information about antibiotic resistance, streamlined drug development programmes and FDA drug approval processes. Audio recordings of focus groups/interviews were reviewed and quotes excerpted and categorised to identify key themes.

participantsTwo primary stakeholder groups were engaged: one comprising caregivers, healthy persons and patients who had recovered from or were at risk of resistant infection (N=67; 11 focus groups); and one comprising physicians who treat resistant infections (N=23).

resultsResponses from focus groups/interviews indicated widespread awareness among patients/caregivers and physicians of the seriousness of the problem of antibacterial resistance. Both groups were willing to accept a degree of uncertainty regarding the balance of risk and benefit in a new therapy where a serious unmet need exists, but also expressed a desire for rigorous monitoring and rapid, transparent reporting of safety/effectiveness data. Both groups wanted to ensure that >1 physician had input on whether to treat patients with antibiotics developed through a streamlined process. Some patients/caregivers unfamiliar with exigencies of critical care suggested a relatively large multidisciplinary team, while physicians believed individual expert consultations would be preferable. Both groups agreed that careful oversight and stewardship of antibacterial drugs are needed to ensure patient safety, preserve efficacy and prevent abuse.

conclusionsGroups comprising patients/caregivers and physicians were aware of serious issues posed by resistant infections and the lack of effective antibacterial drug therapies and shared a consensus that streamlined development programmes represent a necessary response to the resistance crisis, but one that requires enhanced safeguards and risk communication.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDrug Resistance, BacterialHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAnti-Bacterial AgentsCaregiversCommunicationFocus GroupsHumansPatientsPhysiciansQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic resistanceDrug approvalDrug evaluationDrug resistance, bacterialDrug resistance, multipleQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID28186948
PMCPMC5128892
OpenAlexW2551821484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.