Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28186945›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2016

Effect of an evidence-based website on healthcare usage: an interrupted time-series study.

Wouter A Spoelman, Tobias N Bonten, Margot W M de Waal, Ton Drenthen, Ivo J M Smeele, Markus M J Nielen, Niels H Chavannes

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wouter A SpoelmanDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Tobias N BontenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Margot W M de WaalDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ton DrenthenDutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ivo J M SmeeleDutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Markus M J NielenDepartment of Primary Care, NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Niels H ChavannesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHealthcare costs and usage are rising. Evidence-based online health information may reduce healthcare usage, but the evidence is scarce. The objective of this study was to determine whether the release of a nationwide evidence-based health website was associated with a reduction in healthcare usage.

designInterrupted time series analysis of observational primary care data of healthcare use in the Netherlands from 2009 to 2014.

settingGeneral community primary care. POPULATION: 912 000 patients who visited their general practitioners 18.1 million times during the study period.

interventionIn March 2012, an evidence-based health information website was launched by the Dutch College of General Practitioners. It was easily accessible and understandable using plain language. At the end of the study period, the website had 2.9 million unique page views per month. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Primary outcome was the change in consultation rate (consultations/1000 patients/month) before and after the release of the website. Additionally, a reference group was created by including consultations about topics not being viewed at the website. Subgroup analyses were performed for type of consultations, sex, age and socioeconomic status.

resultsAfter launch of the website, the trend in consultation rate decreased with 1.620 consultations/1000 patients/month (p<0.001). This corresponds to a 12% decline in consultations 2 years after launch of the website. The trend in consultation rate of the reference group showed no change. The subgroup analyses showed a specific decline for consultations by phone and were significant for all other subgroups, except for the youngest age group.

conclusionsHealthcare usage decreased by 12% after providing high-quality evidence-based online health information. These findings show that e-Health can be effective to improve self-management and reduce healthcare usage in times of increasing healthcare costs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInternetInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationTelemedicineYoung AdulteHealthhealth care utilizationhealth communicationinterrupted time seriesPRIMARY CAREPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID28186945
PMCPMC5128895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.