Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28186928›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Collecting biological material from palliative care patients in the last weeks of life: a feasibility study.

Séamus Coyle, Aileen Scott, Amara Callistus Nwosu, Richard Latten, James Wilson, Catriona R Mayland, Stephen Mason, Chris Probert, John Ellershaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Séamus CoyleMarie Curie Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4761-9703
Aileen ScottMarie Curie Hospice Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Amara Callistus NwosuMarie Curie Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Richard LattenMarie Curie Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
James WilsonInstitute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Catriona R MaylandMarie Curie Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Stephen MasonMarie Curie Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Chris ProbertDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
John EllershawMarie Curie Palliative Care Institute Liverpool, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the feasibility of prospectively collecting biological samples (urine) from palliative care patients in the last weeks of life.

settingA 30-bedded specialist hospice in the North West of England.

participantsParticipants were adults with a diagnosis of advanced disease and able to provide written informed consent.

methodPotential participants were identified by a senior clinician over a 12-week period in 2014. They were then approached by a researcher and invited to participate according to a developed recruitment protocol. OUTCOMES: Feasibility targets included a recruitment rate of 50%, with successful collection of samples from 80% who consented.

resultsA total of 58 patients were approached and 33 consented (57% recruitment rate). Twenty-five patients (43%) were unable to participate or declined; 10 (17%) became unwell, too fatigued, lost capacity, died or were discharged home; and 15 (26%) refused, usually these patients had distressing pain, low mood or profound fatigue. From the 33 recruited, 20 participants provided 128 separate urine samples, 12 participants did not meet the inclusion criteria at the time of consent and 1 participant was unable to provide a sample. The criterion for a urinary catheter was removed for the latter 6 weeks. The collection rate during the first 6 weeks was 29% and 93% for the latter 6 weeks. Seven people died while the study was ongoing, and another 4 participants died in the following 4 weeks.

conclusionsIt is possible to recruit and collect multiple biological samples over time from palliative care patients in the last weeks and days of life even if they have lost capacity. Research into the biological changes at the end of life could develop a greater understanding of the biology of the dying process. This may lead to improved prognostication and care of patients towards the end of life.

Indexed as

Palliative CareAgedAged, 80 and overEnglandFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeUrine Specimen CollectionSTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

Identifiers

PMID28186928
PMCPMC5128854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.