Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28186449›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery2017

Efficacy and outcomes of facial nerve-sparing treatment approach to cerebellopontine angle meningiomas.

Randy S D'Amico, Matei A Banu, Petros Petridis, Alexandra S Bercow, Hani Malone, Moshe Praver, Tony J C Wang, Steven R Isaacson, Michael B Sisti

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. The Underserved Survivors of Nonmalignant Brain Tumors.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Skull Base Meningiomas.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Randy S D'AmicoDepartments of1Neurological Surgery and.
Matei A BanuDepartments of1Neurological Surgery and.
Petros PetridisDepartments of1Neurological Surgery and.
Alexandra S BercowDepartments of1Neurological Surgery and.
Hani MaloneDepartments of1Neurological Surgery and.
Moshe PraverDepartments of1Neurological Surgery and.
Tony J C Wang2Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Steven R IsaacsonDepartments of1Neurological Surgery and.
Michael B SistiDepartments of1Neurological Surgery and.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

The Brief Research in Aging and Interdisciplinary NeurosciencesT35AG044303 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Sachin Agarwal, Jennifer Jaie Manly · 2013 to 2026
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS T35 AG044303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Advanced microsurgical techniques contribute to reduced morbidity and improved surgical management of meningiomas arising within the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). However, the goal of surgery has evolved to preserve the quality of the patient's life, even if it means leaving residual tumor. Concurrently, Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has become an acceptable and effective treatment modality for newly diagnosed, recurrent, or progressive meningiomas of the CPA. The authors review their institutional experience with CPA meningiomas treated with GKRS, surgery, or a combination of surgery and GKRS. They specifically focus on rates of facial nerve preservation and characterize specific anatomical features of tumor location with respect to the internal auditory canal (IAC). METHODS Medical records of 76 patients with radiographic evidence or a postoperative diagnosis of CPA meningioma, treated by a single surgeon between 1992 and 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with CPA meningiomas smaller than 2.5 cm in greatest dimension were treated with GKRS, while patients with tumors 2.5 cm or larger underwent facial nerve-sparing microsurgical resection where appropriate. Various patient, clinical, and tumor data were gathered. Anatomical features of the tumor origin as seen on preoperative imaging confirmed by intraoperative investigation were evaluated for prognostic significance. Facial nerve preservation rates were evaluated. RESULTS According to our treatment paradigm, 51 (67.1%) patients underwent microsurgical resection and 25 (32.9%) patients underwent GKRS. Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 34 (66.7%) patients, and subtotal resection (STR) in 17 (33.3%) patients. Tumors recurred in 12 (23.5%) patients initially treated surgically, requiring additional surgery and/or GKRS. Facial nerve function was unchanged or improved in 68 (89.5%) patients. Worsening facial nerve function occurred in 8 (10.5%) patients, all of whom had undergone microsurgical resection. Upfront treatment with GKRS for CPA meningiomas smaller than 2.5 cm was associated with preservation of facial nerve function in all patients over a median follow-up of 46 months, regardless of IAC invasion and tumor origin. Anatomical origin was associated with extent of resection but did not correlate with postoperative facial nerve function. Tumor size, extent of resection, and the presence of an arachnoid plane separating the tumor and the contents of the IAC were associated with postoperative facial nerve outcomes. CONCLUSIONS CPA meningiomas remain challenging lesions to treat, given their proximity to critical neurovascular structures. GKRS is a safe and effective option for managing CPA meningiomas smaller than 2.5 cm without associated mass effect or acute neurological symptoms. Maximal safe resection with preservation of neurological function can be performed for tumors 2.5 cm or larger without significant risk of facial nerve dysfunction, and, when combined with GKRS for recurrence and/or progression, provides excellent disease control. Anatomical features of the tumor origin offer critical insights for optimizing facial nerve preservation in this cohort.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFacial NerveFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMeningiomaMicrosurgeryMiddle AgedNeuroma, AcousticNeurosurgical ProceduresRadiosurgeryTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment Outcomebrain tumorcerebellopontine angleCN = cranial nerveCPA = cerebellopontine angleEMG = electromyographyEOR = extent of resectionGamma KnifeGKRS = Gamma Knife radiosurgeryGTR = gross-total resectionIAC = internal auditory canalintracranialmeningiomamicrosurgeryoncologyskull baseSTR = subtotal resectionTTP = time to progression

Identifiers

PMID28186449
PMCPMC13110410
OpenAlexW2587070246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.