Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28186194›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Control of finite critical behaviour in a small-scale social system.

Bryan C Daniels, David C Krakauer, Jessica C Flack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beehive scale-free emergent dynamics.Scientific reports · 2024
    Article
  2. Valence and interactions in judicial voting.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Introduction to the special issue: quantifying collectivity.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2021
    Article
  9. Quantifying the impact of network structure on speed and accuracy in collective decision-making.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2021
    Article
  10. Innovations are disproportionately likely in the periphery of a scientific network.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Functional advantages of Lévy walks emerging near a critical point.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Sensitivity of collective outcomes identifies pivotal components.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Article
  16. Individual and collective encoding of risk in animal groups.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Coarse-graining as a downward causation mechanism.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bryan C DanielsASU-SFI Center for Biosocial Complex Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5870-1059
David C KrakauerASU-SFI Center for Biosocial Complex Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA.
Jessica C FlackASU-SFI Center for Biosocial Complex Systems, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many adaptive systems sit near a tipping or critical point. For systems near a critical point small changes to component behaviour can induce large-scale changes in aggregate structure and function. Criticality can be adaptive when the environment is changing, but entails reduced robustness through sensitivity. This tradeoff can be resolved when criticality can be tuned. We address the control of finite measures of criticality using data on fight sizes from an animal society model system (Macaca nemestrina, n=48). We find that a heterogeneous, socially organized system, like homogeneous, spatial systems (flocks and schools), sits near a critical point; the contributions individuals make to collective phenomena can be quantified; there is heterogeneity in these contributions; and distance from the critical point (DFC) can be controlled through biologically plausible mechanisms exploiting heterogeneity. We propose two alternative hypotheses for why a system decreases the distance from the critical point.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, BiologicalSocial BehaviorAnimalsDecision MakingMacaca nemestrina

Identifiers

PMID28186194
PMCPMC5309824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.