Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28185757›Full record

GuidelineThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2017

Molecular Biomarkers for the Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Antonia R Sepulveda, Stanley R Hamilton, Carmen J Allegra, Wayne Grody, Allison M Cushman-Vokoun, William K Funkhouser, Scott E Kopetz, Christopher Lieu, Noralane M Lindor, Bruce D Minsky and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 148 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frequency ofFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Recommendations for the optimal management of peritoneal metastases in patients with colorectal cancer: a TTD and GECOP-SEOQ expert consensus statement.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

Antonia R SepulvedaDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY. Electronic address: as4400@cumc.columbia.edu.
Stanley R HamiltonDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Carmen J AllegraDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida Medical Center, Gainesville.
Wayne GrodyDepartments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pediatrics, and Human Genetics, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Allison M Cushman-VokounDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
William K FunkhouserDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill.
Scott E KopetzDepartment of Gastrointestinal (GI) Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Christopher LieuDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Denver.
Noralane M LindorDepartment of Medical Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ.
Bruce D MinskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Federico A MonzonCastle Biosciences, Friendswood, TX.
Daniel J SargentDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Veena M SinghBiocept, San Diego, CA.
Joseph WillisDepartment of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
Jennifer ClarkASCP Institute for Science, Technology, and Policy, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Washington, DC.
Carol ColasaccoLaboratory and Pathology Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL.
R Bryan RumbleAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA.
Robyn Temple-SmolkinAssociation for Molecular Pathology, Bethesda, MD.
Christina B VenturaLaboratory and Pathology Quality Center, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL.
Jan A NowakDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCollege of American Pathologists · USAmerican Society for Clinical Pathology · USAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology · USBiopeptide (United States) · USCase Western Reserve University · USColumbia University · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUCLA Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop evidence-based guideline recommendations through a systematic review of the literature to establish standard molecular biomarker testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens.

methodsThe American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to establish standard molecular biomarker testing and guide therapies for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included more than 4,000 articles was conducted.

resultsTwenty-one guideline statements were established.

conclusionsEvidence supports mutational testing for EGFR signaling pathway genes, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize CRC molecular testing are presented. Key Words: Molecular diagnostics; Gastrointestinal; Histology; Genetics; Oncology.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDisease ManagementGene FrequencyGenomic InstabilityHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMolecular Targeted TherapyMutationMutation RatePrognosisSignal TransductionSystematic Reviews as TopicTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID28185757
PMCPMC5971222
OpenAlexW2586443587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.