Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28185561›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

Optimized pipeline of MuTect and GATK tools to improve the detection of somatic single nucleotide polymorphisms in whole-exome sequencing data.

Ítalo Faria do Valle, Enrico Giampieri, Giorgia Simonetti, Antonella Padella, Marco Manfrini, Anna Ferrari, Cristina Papayannidis, Isabella Zironi, Marianna Garonzi, Simona Bernardi and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Case Report: Co-occurringFrontiers in genetics · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Imaging-Based Screening Identifies Modulators of theAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Imaging-based screening identifies modulators of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ítalo Faria do ValleDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Enrico GiampieriDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giorgia SimonettiDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Antonella PadellaDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Marco ManfriniDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Anna FerrariDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Cristina PapayannidisDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Isabella ZironiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Marianna GaronziDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Simona BernardiUnit of Blood Diseases and Stem Cell Transplantation, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Massimo DelledonneDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Giovanni MartinelliDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Daniel RemondiniDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. daniel.remondini@unibo.it.
Gastone CastellaniDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITUniversity of Verona · ITCoordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · BRUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetecting somatic mutations in whole exome sequencing data of cancer samples has become a popular approach for profiling cancer development, progression and chemotherapy resistance. Several studies have proposed software packages, filters and parametrizations. However, many research groups reported low concordance among different methods. We aimed to develop a pipeline which detects a wide range of single nucleotide mutations with high validation rates. We combined two standard tools - Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) and MuTect - to create the GATK-LOD

resultsThe software MuTect presented the highest validation rate (90 %) for mutation detection, but limited number of somatic mutations detected. The GATK detected a high number of mutations but with low specificity. The GATK-LOD

conclusionWe presented a pipeline that detects a wide range of somatic single nucleotide variants, with good validation rates, from exome sequencing data of cancer samples. We also showed the advantage of combining standard algorithms to create the GATK-LOD

Indexed as

ExomePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationNeoplasmsSensitivity and SpecificitySoftwareCancerSomatic single nucleotide variantsWhole exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID28185561
PMCPMC5123378
OpenAlexW2552158984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.