ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
Protein complex prediction for large protein protein interaction networks with the Core&Peel method.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide identification of maize G protein genes and regulatory roles of the ZmGG1 subfamily in saline-alkali stress response.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Computational Approaches to Predict Protein-Protein Interactions in Crowded Cellular Environments.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Computational identification of protein complexes from network interactions: Present state, challenges, and the way forward.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Gene Expression Profiling of Glioblastoma to Recognize Potential Biomarker Candidates.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Accurate prediction of breast cancer survival through coherent voting networks with gene expression profiling.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Performance improvement for a 2D convolutional neural network by using SSC encoding on protein-protein interaction tasks.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- AI applications in functional genomics.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Efficient and accurate identification of protein complexes from protein-protein interaction networks based on the clustering coefficient.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Finding disease modules for cancer and COVID-19 in gene co-expression networks with the Core&Peel method.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Challenges in the construction of knowledge bases for human microbiome-disease associations.Microbiome · 2019Review
- Integrating data and knowledge to identify functional modules of genes: a multilayer approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Identifying protein complexes based on node embeddings obtained from protein-protein interaction networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- CPredictor3.0: detecting protein complexes from PPI networks with expression data and functional annotations.BMC systems biology · 2017Article
- Article
- BITS 2015: the annual meeting of the Italian Society of Bioinformatics.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiological networks play an increasingly important role in the exploration of functional modularity and cellular organization at a systemic level. Quite often the first tools used to analyze these networks are clustering algorithms. We concentrate here on the specific task of predicting protein complexes (PC) in large protein-protein interaction networks (PPIN). Currently, many state-of-the-art algorithms work well for networks of small or moderate size. However, their performance on much larger networks, which are becoming increasingly common in modern proteome-wise studies, needs to be re-assessed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We present a new fast algorithm for clustering large sparse networks: Core&Peel, which runs essentially in time and storage O(a(G)m+n) for a network G of n nodes and m arcs, where a(G) is the arboricity of G (which is roughly proportional to the maximum average degree of any induced subgraph in G). We evaluated Core&Peel on five PPI networks of large size and one of medium size from both yeast and homo sapiens, comparing its performance against those of ten state-of-the-art methods. We demonstrate that Core&Peel consistently outperforms the ten competitors in its ability to identify known protein complexes and in the functional coherence of its predictions. Our method is remarkably robust, being quite insensible to the injection of random interactions. Core&Peel is also empirically efficient attaining the second best running time over large networks among the tested algorithms.
conclusionsOur algorithm Core&Peel pushes forward the state-of the-art in PPIN clustering providing an algorithmic solution with polynomial running time that attains experimentally demonstrable good output quality and speed on challenging large real networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.