Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28185551›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Assisted transcriptome reconstruction and splicing orthology.

Samuel Blanquart, Jean-Stéphane Varré, Paul Guertin, Amandine Perrin, Anne Bergeron, Krister M Swenson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ExceS-A: an exon-centric split aligner.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Samuel BlanquartInria, Université de Lille, Lille, France.
Jean-Stéphane VarréUniversité de Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, Inria, UMR 9189 - CRIStAL, Lille, France.
Paul GuertinLaCIM, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Amandine PerrinUniversité de Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, Inria, UMR 9189 - CRIStAL, Lille, France.
Anne BergeronLaCIM, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Krister M SwensonLIRMM, CNRS - Université de Montpellier, 161 rue Ada, Montpellier, 34392, France. swenson@lirmm.fr.
Université du Québec à Montréal · CACentre de Recherche en Informatique · FRInstitut Pasteur · FRLaboratoire d'Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier · FRUniversité de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscriptome reconstruction, defined as the identification of all protein isoforms that may be expressed by a gene, is a notably difficult computational task. With real data, the best methods based on RNA-seq data identify barely 21 % of the expressed transcripts. While waiting for algorithms and sequencing techniques to improve - as has been strongly suggested in the literature - it is important to evaluate assisted transcriptome prediction; this is the question of how alternative transcription in one species performs as a predictor of protein isoforms in another relatively close species. Most evidence-based gene predictors use transcripts from other species to annotate a genome, but the predictive power of procedures that use exclusively transcripts from external species has never been quantified. The cornerstone of such an evaluation is the correct identification of pairs of transcripts with the same splicing patterns, called splicing orthologs.

resultsWe propose a rigorous procedural definition of splicing orthologs, based on the identification of all ortholog pairs of splicing sites in the nucleotide sequences, and alignments at the protein level. Using our definition, we compared 24 382 human transcripts and 17 909 mouse transcripts from the highly curated CCDS database, and identified 11 122 splicing orthologs. In prediction mode, we show that human transcripts can be used to infer over 62 % of mouse protein isoforms. When restricting the predictions to transcripts known eight years ago, the percentage grows to 74 %. Using CCDS timestamped releases, we also analyze the evolution of the number of splicing orthologs over the last decade.

conclusionsAlternative splicing is now recognized to play a major role in the protein diversity of eukaryotic organisms, but definitions of spliced isoform orthologs are still approximate. Here we propose a definition adapted to the subtle variations of conserved alternative splicing sites, and use it to validate numerous accurate orthologous isoform predictions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsTranscriptomeAlternative SplicingAnimalsComputational BiologyExonsHumansMiceProtein IsoformsProteinsRNAProtein IsoformsProteinsRNAEukaryotesSplicing orthologsTranscriptome prediction

Identifiers

PMID28185551
PMCPMC5123294
OpenAlexW2555896371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.