ReviewCongenital anomalies2017
Medical cost savings in Sakado City and worldwide achieved by preventing disease by folic acid fortification.
Review in Congenital anomalies, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Fortification of rice with vitamins and minerals for addressing micronutrient malnutrition.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Food Intervention with Folate Reduces TNF-α and Interleukin Levels in Overweight and Obese Women with theNutrients · 2020Trial
- Long-Term Health and Economic Impact of a Community-Based, Gene-Guided, Nutrition Program: The Sakado Folate Project in Japan.Nutrients · 2026Article
- The Potential Use of Vitamin D3 and Phytochemicals for Their Anti-Ageing Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Involvement of folate and vitamin B12 deficiency in patients with normocytic anemia.Fujita medical journal · 2023Article
- Influence of Nutritional Intakes in Japan and the United States on COVID-19 Infection.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Medical cost savings in Sakado City and worldwide achieved by preventing disease by folic acid fortification.Congenital anomalies · 2017Review
- Genetic polymorphisms and folate status.Congenital anomalies · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of mandatory fortification of grains with folate in 1998 in the United States resulted in 767 fewer spina bifida cases annually and a cost saving of $603 million per year. However, far more significant medical cost savings result from preventing common diseases, including myocardial infarction, stroke, dementia and osteoporosis. A cost-effectiveness analysis showed a gain of 266 649 quality-adjusted life-years and $3.6 billion saved annually, mainly due to the reduction of cardiac infarction. The recommended folate intake in Japan is 240 μg/day whereas it is 400 μg/day internationally. Our Sakado Folate Project targeted individuals with genetic polymorphism of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase or with hyperhomocysteinemia. Using, for example, folate-fortified rice, resulted in an increase in serum folate and a decrease in serum homocysteine in the participants, and reduced medical costs were achieved by decreasing myocardial infarction, stroke, dementia and fracture. Due to the small population of Sakado City (approximately 101 000) and small number of births (693) in 2015, a decrease in spina bifida could not be confirmed but there was a significant decrease in the number of very low birthweight infants. The genome notification of subjects was effective in motivating intake of folate, but the increase in serum folate (from 17.4 to 22.5 nmol/L, 129%) was less than that observed following compulsory folic acid fortification of cereals in the USA (from 12.1 to 30.2 nmol/L, 149.6%). Mandatory folic acid fortification is cheap in decreasing medical costs and is thus recommended in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.