Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28185173›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2017

Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Matteo Lambertini, Lucia Del Mastro, Giulia Viglietti, Noam F Pondé, Cinzia Solinas, Evandro de Azambuja

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Fertility and Pregnancy-Related Issues in YoungBreast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fertility preservation in ovarian tumours.Ecancermedicalscience · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Matteo LambertiniBrEAST Data Centre, Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium. matteo.lambertini85@gmail.com.
Lucia Del MastroDepartment of Medical Oncology, U.O. Sviluppo Terapie Innovative, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy.
Giulia VigliettiBreast Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Institut Jules Bordet, l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium.
Noam F PondéBrEAST Data Centre, Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium.
Cinzia SolinasMolecular Immunology Unit, Institut Jules Bordet, l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium.
Evandro de AzambujaBrEAST Data Centre, Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium.
Institut Jules Bordet · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEOspedale Policlinico San Martino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementBreast cancers arising in young women are biologically more aggressive, and most of these patients are candidates to receive aggressive treatments that include the use of chemotherapy. As most of these tumors express the hormone receptors (i.e., luminal disease), these patients are also candidates to adjuvant endocrine therapy. Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea showed to be prognostic in young patients with luminal breast cancer. However, the role of ovarian function suppression (OFS) in addition to standard adjuvant treatments has been largely debated over the past years. Recently, several studies have provided important insights on the role of OFS. Currently, the use of tamoxifen alone without prior cytotoxic therapy can be considered a very effective treatment option in young patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer at low risk of relapse. On the other hand, for patients at higher risk of relapse as those who are candidates to (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, OFS proved to be beneficial, and therefore luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (LHRHa) should be considered in addition to tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors (AI). However, toxicity is considerable and patients should be actively engaged in decision-making. Finally, in young breast cancer patients who are candidates to (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, loss of ovarian function and fertility may be a concern. Besides other techniques, recent results showed that temporary OFS with LHRHa during cytotoxic treatment can be considered a reliable strategy to preserve gonadal function and fertility. Despite the recent advances in the field, several gray zones remain unanswered: the role of OFS plus AI in women who remained premenopausal after 5 years of tamoxifen, the optimal extended approach in women treated with 5 years of OFS plus AI, and the role of temporary OFS with LHRHa during chemotherapy in the specific subgroup of patients with BRCA mutations and in women undergoing this strategy after prior embryo/oocyte cryopreservation.

Indexed as

PremenopauseAmenorrheaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFertilityFertility PreservationHumansNeoplasm StagingOvaryPrognosisTreatment OutcomeAdjuvant endocrine therapyBreast cancerFertility preservationLHRHaOvarian function suppressionPremenopausal patientsYoung patients

Identifiers

PMID28185173
OpenAlexW2587562413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.