Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28185140›Full record

ArticleClinical drug investigation2017

Cost-Utility Analysis of Three Iron Chelators Used in Monotherapy for the Treatment of Chronic Iron Overload in β-Thalassaemia Major Patients: An Italian Perspective.

Alessia Pepe, Giuseppe Rossi, Anthony Bentley, Maria Caterina Putti, Ludovica Frizziero, Domenico Giuseppe D'Ascola, Liana Cuccia, Anna Spasiano, Aldo Filosa, Vincenzo Caruso and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Changing patterns of thalassaemia in Italy: a WebThal perspective.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Economic Evaluation of Chelation Regimens for β-Thalassemia Major: a Systematic Review.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Alessia PepeMagnetic Resonance Imaging Unit, Fondazione G. Monasterio CNR-Regione Toscana, Area della Ricerca S. Cataldo, Via Moruzzi, 56124, Pisa, Italy. alessia.pepe@ftgm.it.
Giuseppe RossiEpidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Clinical Physiology, CNR, Pisa, Italy.
Anthony BentleyDecision Resources Group Abacus, Bicester, Oxfordshire, UK.
Maria Caterina PuttiDipartimento di Pediatria, Clinica di Emato-Oncologia Pediatrica, Università di Padova/Azienda Ospedaliera, Padua, Italy.
Ludovica FrizzieroDipartimento di Pediatria, Clinica di Emato-Oncologia Pediatrica, Università di Padova/Azienda Ospedaliera, Padua, Italy.
Domenico Giuseppe D'AscolaU.O. Microcitemie, A.O. "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli", Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Liana CucciaU.O.C. Ematologia con Talassemia, ARNAS Ospedale Civico, Palermo, Italy.
Anna SpasianoU.O.S.D. Centro per le Microcitemie, AORN Cardarelli, Naples, Italy.
Aldo FilosaU.O.S.D. Centro per le Microcitemie, AORN Cardarelli, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo CarusoU.O.D. Talassemia, ARNAS "Garibaldi", Catania, Italy.
Aishah HanifDecision Resources Group Abacus, Bicester, Oxfordshire, UK.
Antonella MeloniMagnetic Resonance Imaging Unit, Fondazione G. Monasterio CNR-Regione Toscana, Area della Ricerca S. Cataldo, Via Moruzzi, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio · ITOspedale Microcitemico · ITAzienda di Rilievo Nazionale ed Alta Specializzazione · ITAzienda ospedaliera "Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli" · ITAzienda Ospedaliera di Padova · ITIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITOspedale Garibaldi · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDeferiprone (DFP), deferasirox (DFX) and deferoxamine (DFO) are used in thalassaemia major (TM) patients to treat chronic iron overload. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of DFP, compared with DFX and DFO monotherapy, from an Italian healthcare system perspective.

methodsA Markov model was used over a time horizon of 5 years. Italian-specific cost data were combined with Italian efficacy data. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated for each treatment, with cost-effectiveness expressed as cost per QALY.

resultsIn all scenarios modelled, DFP was the dominant treatment strategy. Sensitivity analyses showed that DFP dominated the other treatments with a >99% likelihood of being cost-effective against DFX and DFO at a willingness to pay threshold of €20,000 per QALY.

conclusionsDFP was the dominant and most cost-effective treatment for managing chronic iron overload in TM patients. Its use can result in substantial cost savings for the Italian healthcare system.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsBenzoatesbeta-ThalassemiaCohort StudiesCost-Benefit AnalysisDeferasiroxDeferiproneDeferoxamineDrug Administration RoutesHumansIron Chelating AgentsItalyPyridonesTreatment OutcomeTriazolesBenzoatesDeferasiroxDeferiproneDeferoxamineIron Chelating AgentsPyridonesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID28185140
OpenAlexW2586824045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.