ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2017
The "sugar" coarse-grained DNA model.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing an Implicit Solvation Machine Learning Model for Molecular Simulations of Ionic Media.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Asymmetric Periodic Boundary Conditions for All-Atom Molecular Dynamics and Coarse-Grained Simulations of Nucleic Acids.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2023Article
- Computational Modeling of DNA 3D Structures: From Dynamics and Mechanics to Folding.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- An associative memory Hamiltonian model for DNA and nucleosomes.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Bottom-Up Coarse-Grained Modeling of DNA.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- Kinetics of the Conformational Transformation between B- and A-Forms in the Drew-Dickerson Dodecamer.ACS omega · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More than 20 coarse-grained (CG) DNA models have been developed for simulating the behavior of this molecule under various conditions, including those required for nanotechnology. However, none of these models reproduces the DNA polymorphism associated with conformational changes in the ribose rings of the DNA backbone. These changes make an essential contribution to the DNA local deformability and provide the possibility of the transition of the DNA double helix from the B-form to the A-form during interactions with biological molecules. We propose a CG representation of the ribose conformational flexibility. We substantiate the choice of the CG sites (six per nucleotide) needed for the "sugar" GC DNA model, and obtain the potentials of the CG interactions between the sites by the "bottom-up" approach using the all-atom AMBER force field. We show that the representation of the ribose flexibility requires one non-harmonic and one three-particle potential, the forms of both the potentials being different from the ones generally used. The model also includes (i) explicit representation of ions (in an implicit solvent) and (ii) sequence dependence. With these features, the sugar CG DNA model reproduces (with the same parameters) both the B- and A- stable forms under corresponding conditions and demonstrates both the A to B and the B to A phase transitions. Graphical Abstract The proposed coarse-grained DNA model allows to reproduce both the B- and A- DNA forms and the transitions between them under corresponding conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28185115What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.