Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28185050›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2017

A unified canonical correlation analysis-based framework for removing gradient artifact in concurrent EEG/fMRI recording and motion artifact in walking recording from EEG signal.

Junhua Li, Yu Chen, Fumihiko Taya, Julian Lim, Kianfoong Wong, Yu Sun, Anastasios Bezerianos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of 3D paradigm synchronous motion for SSVEP-based hybrid BCI-VR system.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Junhua LiSingapore Institute for Neurotechnology (SINAPSE), Centre for Life Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Yu ChenSingapore Institute for Neurotechnology (SINAPSE), Centre for Life Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Fumihiko TayaSingapore Institute for Neurotechnology (SINAPSE), Centre for Life Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Julian LimCenter of Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorder Program, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Kianfoong WongCenter of Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorder Program, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Yu SunSingapore Institute for Neurotechnology (SINAPSE), Centre for Life Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. lsisu@nus.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6666-8586
Anastasios BezerianosSingapore Institute for Neurotechnology (SINAPSE), Centre for Life Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. tassos.bezerianos@nus.edu.sg.

Funding

Ministry of Education - Singapore MOE2014-T2-1-115National University of Singapore R-719-001-102-232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artifacts cause distortion and fuzziness in electroencephalographic (EEG) signal and hamper EEG analysis, so it is necessary to remove them prior to the analysis. Particularly, artifact removal becomes a critical issue in experimental protocols with significant inherent recording noise, such as mobile EEG recordings and concurrent EEG-fMRI acquisitions. In this paper, we proposed a unified framework based on canonical correlation analysis for artifact removal. Raw signals were reorganized to construct a pair of matrices, based on which sources were sought through maximizing autocorrelation. Those sources related to artifacts were then removed by setting them as zeros, and the remaining sources were used to reconstruct artifact-free EEG. Both simulated and real recorded data were utilized to assess the proposed framework. Qualitative and quantitative results showed that the proposed framework was effective to remove artifacts from EEG signal. Specifically, the proposed method outperformed independent component analysis method for mitigating motion-related artifacts and had advantages for removing gradient artifact compared to the classical method (average artifacts subtraction) and the state-of-the-art method (optimal basis set) in terms of the combination of performance and computational complexity.

Indexed as

AdultArtifactsElectroencephalographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotionWalkingYoung AdultArtifact removalCanonical correlation analysis (CCA)Concurrent EEG–fMRI recordingElectroencephalogram (EEG)Electromyogram (EMG)Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)Gradient artifact

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.