Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28184943›Full record

ArticleOncology reports2017

Analysis of chromosomal radiosensitivity of healthy BRCA2 mutation carriers and non-carriers in BRCA families with the G2 micronucleus assay.

Annelot Baert, Julie Depuydt, Tom Van Maerken, Bruce Poppe, Fransiska Malfait, Tim Van Damme, Sylvia De Nobele, Gianpaolo Perletti, Kim De Leeneer, Kathleen B M Claes and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annelot BaertDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Julie DepuydtDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Tom Van MaerkenDepartment of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Bruce PoppeCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Fransiska MalfaitCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Tim Van DammeCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Sylvia De NobeleCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Gianpaolo PerlettiDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Kim De LeeneerCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Kathleen B M ClaesCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Anne VralDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BEGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer risk drastically increases in individuals with a heterozygous germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, while it is estimated to equal the population risk for relatives without the familial mutation (non-carriers). The aim of the present study was to use a G2 phase-specific micronucleus assay to investigate whether lymphocytes of healthy BRCA2 mutation carriers are characterized by increased radiosensitivity compared to controls without a family history of breast/ovarian cancer and how this relates to healthy non-carrier relatives. BRCA2 is active in homologous recombination, a DNA damage repair pathway, specifically active in the late S/G2 phase of the cell cycle. We found a significantly increased radiosensitivity in a cohort of healthy BRCA2 mutation carriers compared to individuals without a familial history of breast cancer (P=0.046; Mann-Whitney U test). At the individual level, 50% of healthy BRCA2 mutation carriers showed a radiosensitive phenotype (radiosensitivity score of 1 or 2), whereas 83% of the controls showed no radiosensitivity (P=0.038; one-tailed Fisher's exact test). An odds ratio of 5 (95% CI, 1.07-23.47) indicated an association between the BRCA2 mutation and radiosensitivity in healthy mutation carriers. These results indicate the need for the gentle use of ionizing radiation for either diagnostic or therapeutic use in BRCA2 mutation carriers. We detected no increased radiosensitivity in the non-carrier relatives.

Indexed as

AdultBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinChromosome BreakageFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHealthy VolunteersHumansMicronucleus TestsMutationRadiation ToleranceBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28184943
PMCPMC5364849
OpenAlexW2581937249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.