Trial reportPhysiological reports2017
Hemodynamic responses are reduced with aerobic compared with resistance blood flow restriction exercise.
Trial report in Physiological reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07406763 (Effect of Adding Blood Flow Restriction to Traditional Program After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Adding Blood Flow Restriction to Traditional Program After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beneficial Role of Blood Flow Restriction Exercise in Heart Disease and Heart Failure Using the Muscle Hypothesis of Chronic Heart Failure and a Growing Literature.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Pooled it
- Chronic Blood Flow Restriction Exercise Improves Objective Physical Function: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Pooled it
- Acute responses of hemodynamic and oxidative stress parameters to aerobic exercise with blood flow restriction in hypertensive elderly women.Molecular biology reports · 2018Trial
- Lower body blood flow restriction training may induce remote muscle strength adaptations in an active unrestricted arm.European journal of applied physiology · 2018Trial
- Efficacy of blood flow restriction exercise during dialysis for end stage kidney disease patients: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.BMC nephrology · 2017Trial
- Hemodynamic responses are reduced with aerobic compared with resistance blood flow restriction exercise.Physiological reports · 2017Trial
- Cardiac autonomic and hemodynamic responses to two-stage cycling and post-exercise recovery with partial blood flow restriction in young males.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Blood Flow Restriction in Athletic Populations-Part 2: Applications in Resistance Training Across the Loading Spectrum.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- Effects of Resistance Exercise with and without Blood Flow Restriction on Acute Hemodynamic Responses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Physiological and perceptual responses to acute arm cranking with blood flow restriction.European journal of applied physiology · 2024Article
- Acute Hemodynamic, Metabolic, and Hormonal Responses to a Boxing Exergame with and without Blood Flow Restriction in Non-Athlete Young Individuals.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effects of 4-Week Low-Load Resistance Training with Blood Flow Restriction on Muscle Strength and Left Ventricular Function in Young Swimmers: A Pilot Randomized Trial.Journal of human kinetics · 2023Article
- Blood flow restriction during the resting periods of high-intensity resistance training does not alter performance but decreases MIR-1 and MIR-133A levels in human skeletal muscle.Sports medicine and health science · 2021Article
- Perceived Barriers to Blood Flow Restriction Training.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2021Review
- Clinical safety of blood flow-restricted training? A comprehensive review of altered muscle metaboreflex in cardiovascular disease during ischemic exercise.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2020Review
- The Effects of Restriction Pressures on the Acute Responses to Blood Flow Restriction Exercise.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
- Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Review
- Hemodynamic Responses to Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction and Unrestricted High-Load Resistance Exercise in Older Women.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hemodynamics of light-load exercise with an applied blood-flow restriction (BFR) have not been extensively compared between light-intensity, BFR, and high-intensity forms of both resistance and aerobic exercise in the same participant population. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to use a randomized crossover design to examine the hemodynamic responses to resistance and aerobic BFR exercise in comparison with a common high-intensity and light-intensity non-BFR exercise. On separate occasions participants completed a leg-press (resistance) or treadmill (aerobic) trial. Each trial comprised a light-intensity bout (LI) followed by a light-intensity bout with BFR (80% resting systolic blood pressure (LI+BFR)), then a high-intensity bout (HI). To characterize the hemodynamic response, measures of cardiac output, stroke volume, heart rate and blood pressure were taken at baseline and exercise for each bout. Exercising hemodynamics for leg-press LI+BFR most often resembled those for HI and were greater than LI (e.g. for systolic blood pressure LI+BFR = 152 ± 3 mmHg; HI = 153 ± 3; LI = 143 ± 3
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.