Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28183807›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Associations of participation in community assets with health-related quality of life and healthcare usage: a cross-sectional study of older people in the community.

Luke A Munford, Mark Sidaway, Amy Blakemore, Matt Sutton, Pete Bower

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Complements or substitutes? Associations between volumes of care provided in the community and hospitals.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Enhancing the multi-dimensional assessment of quality of life: introducing the WHOQOL-Combi.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luke A MunfordManchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Mark SidawayNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Amy BlakemoreNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Matt SuttonManchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Pete BowerNIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 12/130/33Medical Research Council MR/N015126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity assets are promoted as a way to improve quality of life and reduce healthcare usage. However, the quantitative impact of participation in community assets on these outcomes is not known.

methodsWe examined the association between participation in community assets and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (EuroQol-5D-5L) and healthcare usage in 3686 individuals aged ≥65 years. We estimated the unadjusted differences in EuroQol-5D-5L scores and healthcare usage between participants and non-participants in community assets and then used multivariate regression to examine scores adjusted for sociodemographic and limiting long-term health conditions. We derived the net benefits of participation using a range of threshold values for a quality-adjusted life year (QALY).

results50% of individuals reported participation in community assets. Their EuroQol-5D-5L scores were 0.094 (95% CI 0.077 to 0.111) points higher than non-participants. Controlling for sociodemographic characteristics reduced this differential to 0.081 (95% CI 0.064 to 0.098). Further controlling for limiting long-term conditions reduced this effect to 0.039 (95% CI 0.025 to 0.052). Once we adjusted for sociodemographic and limiting long-term conditions, the reductions in healthcare usage and costs associated with community asset participation were not statistically significant. Based on a threshold value of £20 000 per QALY, the net benefits of participation in community assets were £763 (95% CI £478 to £1048) per participant per year.

conclusionsParticipation in community assets is associated with substantially higher HRQoL but is not associated with lower healthcare costs. The social value of developing community assets is potentially substantial.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overCommunity ParticipationCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleGeneral PracticeGeriatric AssessmentHealth Care CostsHumansLinear ModelsMaleMultivariate AnalysisQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRegistriesHEALTH ECONOMICSPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID28183807
PMCPMC5306503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.