Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28183347›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Application of Incident Command Structure to clinical trial management in the academic setting: principles and lessons learned.

Penny S Reynolds, Mary J Michael, Bruce D Spiess

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02303964 (Pre-Hospital Use of Plasma for Traumatic Hemorrhage), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02303964 phase2 / phase3withdrawnnot on this map

Pre-Hospital Use of Plasma for Traumatic Hemorrhage

TypeinterventionalSponsorVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRan2014 to 2016Enrolled0ConditionsShock, HemorrhagicArmsPlasma, Normal saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Penny S ReynoldsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA. PReynolds@anest.ufl.edu.
Mary J MichaelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA.
Bruce D SpiessDepartment of Anesthesiology, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA.

Funding

Center for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000058 · NCATS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2012 to 2015
$12.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical trial success depends on appropriate management, but practical guidance to trial organisation and planning is lacking. The Incident Command System (ICS) is the 'gold standard' management system developed for managing diverse operations in major incident and public health arenas. It enables effective and flexible management through integration of personnel, procedures, resources, and communications within a common hierarchical organisational structure. Conventional ICS organisation consists of five function modules: Command, Planning, Operations, Logistics, and Finance/Administration. Large clinical trials will require a separate Regulatory Administrative arm, and an Information arm, consisting of dedicated data management and information technology staff. We applied ICS principles to organisation and management of the Prehospital Use of Plasma in Traumatic Haemorrhage (PUPTH) trial. This trial was a multidepartmental, multiagency, randomised clinical trial investigating prehospital administration of thawed plasma on mortality and coagulation response in severely injured trauma patients. We describe the ICS system as it would apply to large clinical trials in general, and the benefits, barriers, and lessons learned in utilising ICS principles to reorganise and coordinate the PUPTH trial.

resultsWithout a formal trial management structure, early stages of the trial were characterised by inertia and organisational confusion. Implementing ICS improved organisation, coordination, and communication between multiple agencies and service groups, and greatly streamlined regulatory compliance administration. However, unfamiliarity of clinicians with ICS culture, conflicting resource allocation priorities, and communication bottlenecks were significant barriers.

conclusionsICS is a flexible and powerful organisational tool for managing large complex clinical trials. However, for successful implementation the cultural, psychological, and social environment of trial participants must be accounted for, and personnel need to be educated in the basics of ICS.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02303964 . Registered on 28 November 2014.

Indexed as

PlasmaResearch DesignBlood CoagulationBlood Component TransfusionClinical ProtocolsDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedEmergency Medical ServicesHemorrhageHumansInservice TrainingModels, OrganizationalPatient Care TeamResearch PersonnelTreatment OutcomeWorkflowWounds and InjuriesICSIncident Command StructureTrial failureTrial management

Identifiers

PMID28183347
PMCPMC5301359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.