Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28183345›Full record

Trial reportBMC surgery2017

Robot-assisted single-site compared with laparoscopic single-incision cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Lukasz Filip Grochola, Christopher Soll, Adrian Zehnder, Roland Wyss, Pascal Herzog, Stefan Breitenstein

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02485392 (A Comparison of Robot-assisted Single Site and Laparoscopic Single-incision Cholecystectomy for Benign Gallbladder), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02485392 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Comparison of Robot-assisted Single Site and Laparoscopic Single-incision Cholecystectomy for Benign Gallbladder

TypeinterventionalSponsorKantonsspital Winterthur KSWRan2015 to 2017Enrolled60ConditionsBenign Gallbladder DiseaseArmsDa Vinci Single Site Robot-Assisted Cholecystectomy, Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A scoping review of cognitive load assessment tools suitable for clinicians performing REBOA.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ArtiSentialAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lukasz Filip GrocholaDepartment of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, 8401, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Christopher SollDepartment of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, 8401, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Adrian ZehnderDepartment of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, 8401, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Roland WyssDepartment of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, 8401, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Pascal HerzogDepartment of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, 8401, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Stefan BreitensteinDepartment of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, 8401, Winterthur, Switzerland. stefan.breitenstein@ksw.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9673-2788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in robotic technology suggest that the utilization of the da Vinci Single-Site™ platform for cholecystectomy is safe, feasible and results in a shorter learning curve compared to conventional single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Moreover, the robot-assisted technology has been shown to reduce the surgeon's stress load compared to standard single-incision laparoscopy in an experimental setup, suggesting an important advantage of the da Vinci platform. However, the above-mentioned observations are based solely on case series, case reports and experimental data, as high-quality clinical trials to demonstrate the benefits of the da Vinci Single-Site™ cholecystectomy have not been performed to date.

methodsThis study addresses the question whether robot-assisted Single-Site™ cholecystectomy provides significant benefits over single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of surgeon's stress load, while matching the standards of the conventional single-incision approach with regard to peri- and postoperative outcomes. It is designed as a single centre, single-blinded randomized controlled trial, which compares both surgical approaches with the primary endpoint surgeon's physical and mental stress load at the time of surgery. In addition, the study aims to assess secondary endpoints such as operating time, conversion rates, additional trocar placement, intra-operative blood loss, length of hospital stay, costs of procedure, health-related quality of life, cosmesis and complications. Patients as well as ward staff are blinded until the 1 DISCUSSION: The study is the first randomized controlled trial that compares the da Vinci Single Site™ platform to conventional laparoscopic approaches in cholecystectomy, one of the most frequently performed operations in general surgery.

trial registrationThis trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (trial number: NCT02485392 ). Registered February 19, 2015.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalCholecystectomyCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicGallbladder DiseasesHumansLaparoscopyLearning CurveLength of StayOperative TimeQuality of LifeRoboticsSingle-Blind MethodCholecystectomyda VinciRobot-assisted laparoscopySingle incisionSingle SiteStress loadSurgeon’s Comfort

Identifiers

PMID28183345
PMCPMC5301379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.