Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28183313›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2017

Comparison of virulence of Francisella tularensis ssp. holarctica genotypes B.12 and B.FTNF002-00.

Zsuzsa Kreizinger, Károly Erdélyi, Orsolya Felde, Massimo Fabbi, Kinga M Sulyok, Tibor Magyar, Miklós Gyuranecz

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Animal modelling with theMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Functional characterization ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Virulence ofMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Phylogeography and Genetic Diversity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Genetic Diversity and Spatial Segregation ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Phylogeographic Distribution of Human and HareFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Tularemia in Germany-A Re-emerging Zoonosis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Review
  13. Phylogenetic Lineages ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Zsuzsa KreizingerInstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungária körút 21, H-1143, Budapest, Hungary.
Károly ErdélyiVeterinary Diagnostic Directorate, National Food Chain Safety Office, P.O. Box 21581, Budapest, Hungary.
Orsolya FeldeInstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungária körút 21, H-1143, Budapest, Hungary.
Massimo FabbiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna Bruno Ubertini, National Reference Laboratory for Tularemia, Pavia, 27100, Italy.
Kinga M SulyokInstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungária körút 21, H-1143, Budapest, Hungary.
Tibor MagyarInstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungária körút 21, H-1143, Budapest, Hungary.
Miklós GyuraneczInstitute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungária körút 21, H-1143, Budapest, Hungary. m.gyuranecz@gmail.com.
Centre for Agricultural Research · HUHUN-REN Veterinary Medical Research Institute · HUIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna "Bruno Ubertini" · ITNational Food Chain Safety Office · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwo main genetic groups (B.12 and B.FTNF002-00) of Francisella tularensis ssp. holarctica are endemic in Europe. The B.FTNF002-00 group proved to be dominant in Western European countries, while strains of the B.12 group were isolated mainly in Northern, Central and Eastern Europe. The clinical course of tularemia in the European brown hare (Lepus europaeus) also shows distinct patterns according to the geographical area. Acute course of the disease is observed in hares in Western European countries, while signs of sub-acute or chronic infection are more frequently detected in the eastern part of the continent. The aim of the present study was to examine whether there is any difference in the virulence of the strains belonging to the B.FTNF002-00 and B.12 genetic clades.

resultsExperimental infection of Fischer 344 rats was performed by intra-peritoneal injection of three dilutions of a Hungarian (B.12 genotype) and an Italian (B.FTNF002-00 genotype) F. tularensis ssp. holarctica strain. Moderate difference was observed in the virulence of the two genotypes. Significant differences were observed in total weight loss values and scores of clinical signs between the two genotypes with more rats succumbing to tularemia in groups infected with the B.FTNF002-00 genotype.

conclusionsResults of the experimental infection are consistent with previous clinical observations and pathological studies suggesting that F. tularensis ssp. holarctica genotype B.FTNF002-00 has higher pathogenic potential than the B.12 genotype.

Indexed as

VirulenceAnimalsEuropeFemaleFrancisella tularensisGenotypeRatsTularemiaWeight LossB.12B.13B.FTNF002-00Brown hareExperimental infectionFischer 344 ratTularemia

Identifiers

PMID28183313
PMCPMC5301346
OpenAlexW2587076396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.