Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28183272›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

SEPIa, a knowledge-driven algorithm for predicting conformational B-cell epitopes from the amino acid sequence.

Georgios A Dalkas, Marianne Rooman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Deep learning of antibody epitopes using positional permutation vectors.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  3. WUREN: Whole-modal union representation for epitope prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Computational prediction of multiple antigen epitopes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  6. Multi-perspectives and challenges in identifying B-cell epitopes.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. B-Cell Epitope Predictions Using Computational Methods.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Methods for sequence and structural analysis of B and T cell receptor repertoires.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Georgios A DalkasBioModeling, BioInformatics & BioProcesses (3BIO), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), CP 165/61, 50 Roosevelt Ave, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Marianne RoomanBioModeling, BioInformatics & BioProcesses (3BIO), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), CP 165/61, 50 Roosevelt Ave, 1050, Brussels, Belgium. mrooman@ulb.ac.be.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe identification of immunogenic regions on the surface of antigens, which are able to be recognized by antibodies and to trigger an immune response, is a major challenge for the design of new and effective vaccines. The prediction of such regions through computational immunology techniques is a challenging goal, which will ultimately lead to a drastic limitation of the experimental tests required to validate their efficiency. However, current methods are far from being sufficiently reliable and/or applicable on a large scale.

resultsWe developed SEPIa, a B-cell epitope predictor from the protein sequence, which is sufficiently fast to be applicable on a large scale. The originality of SEPIa lies in the combination of two classifiers, a naïve Bayesian and a random forest classifier, through a voting algorithm that exploits the advantages of both. It is based on 13 sequence-based features, whose values in a 9-residue sequence window are compiled to predict the epitope/non-epitope state of the central residue. The features are related to the type of amino acid, its conservation in homologous proteins, and its tendency of being exposed to the solvent, soluble, flexible, and disordered. The highest signal is obtained from statistical amino acid preferences, but all 13 features contribute non-negligibly in the predictor. SEPIa's average prediction accuracy is limited, with an AUC score (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) that reaches 0.65 both in 10-fold cross-validation and on an independent test set. It is nevertheless slightly higher than that of other methods evaluated on the same test set.

conclusionsSEPIa was applied to a test protein whose epitopes are known, human β2 adrenergic G-protein-coupled receptor, with promising results. Although the actual AUC score is rather low, many of the predicted epitopes cluster together and overlap the experimental epitope region. The reasons underlying the limitations of SEPIa and of all other B-cell epitope predictors are discussed.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceAntigen-Antibody ComplexArea Under CurveEpitopes, B-LymphocyteHumansMolecular Sequence DataProtein Structure, SecondaryReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2ROC CurveAntigen-Antibody ComplexEpitopes, B-LymphocyteReceptors, Adrenergic, beta-2Antigen-antibody complexesB-cell epitopesBioinformatics predictorImmunoinformaticsMachine learningPhysicochemical propertiesStatistical potentialsβ2 adrenergic G-protein-coupled receptor

Identifiers

PMID28183272
PMCPMC5301386
OpenAlexW2587515533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.