Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28182750›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Chemoprophylaxis with sporozoite immunization in P. knowlesi rhesus monkeys confers protection and elicits sporozoite-specific memory T cells in the liver.

Sathit Pichyangkul, Michele D Spring, Kosol Yongvanitchit, Utaiwan Kum-Arb, Amporn Limsalakpetch, Rawiwan Im-Erbsin, Ratawan Ubalee, Pattaraporn Vanachayangkul, Edmond J Remarque, Evelina Angov and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. ANPJ vaccines · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sathit PichyangkulArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9149-3351
Michele D SpringArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Kosol YongvanitchitArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Utaiwan Kum-ArbArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Amporn LimsalakpetchArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Rawiwan Im-ErbsinArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Ratawan UbaleeArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Pattaraporn VanachayangkulArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Edmond J RemarqueBiomedical Primate Research Centre, Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Evelina AngovWalter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Philip L SmithArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
David L SaundersArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science · THBiomedical Primate Research Centre · NLWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole malaria sporozoite vaccine regimens are promising new strategies, and some candidates have demonstrated high rates of durable clinical protection associated with memory T cell responses. Little is known about the anatomical distribution of memory T cells following whole sporozoite vaccines, and immunization of nonhuman primates can be used as a relevant model for humans. We conducted a chemoprophylaxis with sporozoite (CPS) immunization in P. knowlesi rhesus monkeys and challenged via mosquito bites. Half of CPS immunized animals developed complete protection, with a marked delay in parasitemia demonstrated in the other half. Antibody responses to whole sporozoites, CSP, and AMA1, but not CelTOS were detected. Peripheral blood T cell responses to whole sporozoites, but not CSP and AMA1 peptides were observed. Unlike peripheral blood, there was a high frequency of sporozoite-specific memory T cells observed in the liver and bone marrow. Interestingly, sporozoite-specific CD4+ and CD8+ memory T cells in the liver highly expressed chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR6, both of which are known for liver sinusoid homing. The majority of liver sporozoite-specific memory T cells expressed CD69, a phenotypic marker of tissue-resident memory (TRM) cells, which are well positioned to rapidly control liver-stage infection. Vaccine strategies that aim to elicit large number of liver TRM cells may efficiently increase the efficacy and durability of response against pre-erythrocytic parasites.

Indexed as

Immunologic MemoryAnimalsAnophelesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesChemopreventionImmunizationLiverMacaca mulattaMalariaPlasmodiumSporozoites

Identifiers

PMID28182750
PMCPMC5300246
OpenAlexW2586659064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.