Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28182736›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between opening-wedge and closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy: A comprehensive meta-analysis.

Lingfeng Wu, Jun Lin, Zhicheng Jin, Xiaobin Cai, Weiyang Gao

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Closed wedge high tibial osteotomy can reduce medial meniscus extrusion in comparison with open wedge high tibial osteotomy.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Treatment of aseptic nonunion after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy, a reliable procedure for osteoarthritic varus knee.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. High Tibial Osteotomy: Review of Techniques and Biomechanics.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lingfeng WuDepartment of Orthopedics, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital & Central Hospital of Lishui City of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China.
Jun LinDepartment of Orthopedics, Qingyuan Country People's Hospital, Lishui, China.
Zhicheng JinDepartment of Surgery, Second Clinical Medical College, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xiaobin CaiDepartment of Orthopedics, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital & Central Hospital of Lishui City of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui, China.
Weiyang GaoDepartment of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) has been widely used for clinical treatment of osteoarthritis of the medial compartment of the knee, and both opening-wedge and closing-wedge HTO are the most commonly used methods. However, it remains unclear which technique has better clinical and radiological outcomes in practice. To systematically evaluate this issue, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis by pooling all available data for the opening-wedge HTO and closing-wedge HTO techniques from the electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Wed of Science and Cochrane Library. A total of 22 studies encompassing 2582 cases were finally enrolled in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference regarding surgery time, duration of hospitalization, knee pain VAS, Lysholm score and HSS knee score (clinical outcomes) between the opening-wedge and closing-wedge HTO groups (P > 0.05). However, the opening-wedge HTO group showed wider range of motion than the closing-wedge HTO group (P = 0.003). Moreover, as for Hip-Knee-Ankle angle and mean angle of correction, no significant difference was observed between the opening-wedge and closing-wedge HTO groups (P > 0.05), while the opening-wedge HTO group showed greater posterior tibial slope angle (P < 0.001) and lesser patellar height than the closing-wedge HTO group (P < 0.001). On light of the above analysis, we believe that individualized surgical approach should be introduced based on the clinical characteristics of each patient.

Indexed as

AdultClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansKneeKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeOsteotomyPain MeasurementPostoperative ComplicationsRadiographyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularTibia

Identifiers

PMID28182736
PMCPMC5300239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.