Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28182676›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

The swimming test is effective for evaluating spasticity after contusive spinal cord injury.

Youngjae Ryu, Toru Ogata, Motoshi Nagao, Taku Kitamura, Kazuhito Morioka, Yoshinori Ichihara, Toru Doi, Yasuhiro Sawada, Masami Akai, Ryohei Nishimura and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Kahweol improves motor function of mice with spinal cord injury by inhibiting microglial activationNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Conditional Astrocyte Rac1KO Attenuates Hyperreflexia after Spinal Cord Injury.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Youngjae RyuDepartment of Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Toru OgataDepartment of Rehabilitation for the Movement Functions, Research Institute, National Rehabilitation Center, Saitama, Japan.
Motoshi NagaoDepartment of Rehabilitation for the Movement Functions, Research Institute, National Rehabilitation Center, Saitama, Japan.
Taku KitamuraDepartment of Rehabilitation for the Movement Functions, Research Institute, National Rehabilitation Center, Saitama, Japan.
Kazuhito MoriokaDepartment of Rehabilitation for the Movement Functions, Research Institute, National Rehabilitation Center, Saitama, Japan.
Yoshinori IchiharaDepartment of Rehabilitation for the Movement Functions, Research Institute, National Rehabilitation Center, Saitama, Japan.
Toru DoiDepartment of Rehabilitation for the Movement Functions, Research Institute, National Rehabilitation Center, Saitama, Japan.
Yasuhiro SawadaDepartment of Rehabilitation for the Movement Functions, Research Institute, National Rehabilitation Center, Saitama, Japan.
Masami AkaiDepartment of Rehabilitation for the Movement Functions, Research Institute, National Rehabilitation Center, Saitama, Japan.
Ryohei NishimuraDepartment of Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoki FujitaDepartment of Veterinary Surgery, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spasticity is a frequent chronic complication in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the severity of spasticity varies in patients with SCI. Therefore, an evaluation method is needed to determine the severity of spasticity. We used a contusive SCI model that is suitable for clinical translation. In this study, we examined the feasibility of the swimming test and an EMG for evaluating spasticity in a contusive SCI rat model. Sprague-Dawley rats received an injury at the 8th thoracic vertebra. Swimming tests were performed 3 to 6 weeks after SCI induction. We placed the SCI rats into spasticity-strong or spasticity-weak groups based on the frequency of spastic behavior during the swimming test. Subsequently, we recorded the Hoffman reflex (H-reflex) and examined the immunoreactivity of serotonin (5-HT) and its receptor (5-HT2A) in the spinal tissues of the SCI rats. The spasticity-strong group had significantly decreased rate-dependent depression of the H-reflex compared to the spasticity-weak group. The area of 5-HT2A receptor immunoreactivity was significantly increased in the spasticity-strong group. Thus, both electrophysiological and histological evaluations indicate that the spasticity-strong group presented with a more severe upper motor neuron syndrome. We also observed the groups in their cages for 20 hours. Our results suggest that the swimming test provides an accurate evaluation of spasticity in this contusive SCI model. We believe that the swimming test is an effective method for evaluating spastic behaviors and developing treatments targeting spasticity after SCI.

Indexed as

SwimmingAnimalsFemaleH-ReflexMotor NeuronsMuscle SpasticityRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2ASpinal Cord InjuriesReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2A

Identifiers

PMID28182676
PMCPMC5300247
OpenAlexW2587238097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.